Bombay High Court

Shobha Neelkamal TejwaniversusSUBHASHISH DEVELOPERS

Decided: 9 September 2026
Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that there was no apparent error or substantial ground to review the order dated 10 June 2026.

Summary

The petitioner, Shobha Neelkamal Tejwani, filed a review petition challenging the order dated 10 June 2026 passed by this Court in Second Appeal No. 238 of 2026 against Subhashish Developers. The petition sought relief on the ground that the earlier order contained an apparent error or other substantial ground warranting review. The Court examined the record and the contentions raised by the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Vikrant Khare, along with Ganesh Pandit and Arhat Dhivare. It held that no error was apparent on the face of the record and that the petitioner had not demonstrated any substantial ground for review. Consequently, the Court dismissed the review petition, leaving the original order undisturbed.

Issues considered

Whether there is any error apparent on the face of the record in the order dated 10 June 2026
Whether the petitioner has any substantial ground to seek a review of that order

Subjects

review petition
civil appellate jurisdiction
error on record
substantial ground
dismissal

Judgment

                                                                                   33-RPS-1-2026.DOC




                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                           CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                          REVIEW PETITION NO. 1 OF 2026
                                                          IN
                                          SECOND APPEAL NO. 238 OF 2026


                      Shobha Neelkamal Tejwani                                       ..Petitioner
                           Versus
                      Subhashish Developers                                       …Respondent

                      Mr. Vikrant Khare, with Ganesh Pandit and Arhat Dhivare, for the
                            Petitioner.

                                                    CORAM:           N. J. JAMADAR, J.
                                                    DATE :           9th SEPTEMBER 2026


                      P.C.:

                      1.      Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner.

                      2.      There is no error apparent on the face of the record nor there is

                      any substantial ground to review the order dated 10 th June 2026 passed

ARUN
RAMCHANDRA
                      by this Court.
SANKPAL

Digitally signed by
ARUN RAMCHANDRA
SANKPAL
                      3.      Review Petition stands dismissed.
Date: 2026.09.11
10:09:23 +0530




                                                                       [N. J. JAMADAR, J.]




                      ARS                                      1/1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…