Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SAJIDA ABDULLAH SAYYEDversusMUMTAZ AHMAD SHAH

Decided
Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The review petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners, Sajida Abdullah Sayyed & Ors., filed Review Petition No. 120 of 2026 under Writ Petition No. 3386 of 2025. The Court examined the petition and found that the petitioners had not prosecuted the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the review petition for non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the original writ were considered. The dismissal was recorded by both judges of the bench.

Issues considered

  • Whether the review petition should be entertained despite the petitioners' failure to prosecute it

Subjects

  • review petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • high court

Judgment

                                                             1.RPW120.2026.odt



            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                  REVIEW PETITION NO. 120 OF 2026
                                IN
                  WRIT PETITION NO.3386 OF 2025

Sajida Abdullah Sayyed & Ors.                        … Petitioners.
      Versus
Mumtaz Ahmad Shah & Ors.                             … Respondents

                                --------------
None for the Petitioners.
Mr. A.A. Maniyar a/w. Mr. Sharif Khan, Advocate for original
Petitioner and Respondent No.1 in Review Petition.
Ms Ravleen Sabharwal (V.C.) a/w. Ms. Dharni Divekar a/w. Mr.
Rishabh Shah i/b. R.S. Justicia Law Chambers, Advocate for
Respondent-SRA.
Smt. Dr. Dhruti M. Kapadia, AGP for Respondent/State.
                            --------------
                             CORAM : M. S. KARNIK &
                                           S.M. MODAK, JJ.

                                   DATE :        8th OCTOBER, 2026

P.C. :


1.           None for the Petitioners. Dismissed for non-prosecution.



(S.M.MODAK, J.)                        (M. S. KARNIK, J.)




Talwalkar                         1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.