Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SEBASTIAN RUZARIO PARERAversusTHE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (SPECIAL CELL) WESTERN SUBURBS SLUM REHABILITATION

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The review petition is dismissed as there is no error apparent on the face of the record.

Summary

The petitioners, Sebastian Ruzario Parera and others, filed a review petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 24 July 2026 passed by the same Court. The respondents were the Deputy Collector (Special Cell) Western Suburbs Slum Rehabilitation and other officials. The petition sought a review on the ground that the earlier order contained an error apparent on the face of the record. The Court examined the record and found no such error nor any other sufficient ground to entertain a review. Consequently, the Court dismissed the review petition. The decision was delivered by Justice N. J. Jamadar on 31 August 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the order dated 24 July 2026 contains an error apparent on the face of the record warranting a review under Order 47 of the CPC

Subjects

  • review petition
  • error apparent on the face of the record
  • Civil Procedure Code
  • High Court
  • judicial review

Judgment

                                                                         5-RPW33-2026.DOC

                                                                                  Santosh

                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION


                                     REVIEW PETITION NO. 33 OF 2026

                      Sebastian Ruzario Parera and ors.                    ...Petitioners
                                        Versus
                      The Deputy Collector (Special Cell) Western
                      Suburbs Slum Rehabilitation and ors.               …Respondents

                      Mr. Akash Rebello, i/b Khan Ali Raza, for the Petitioners.
                      Mr. Akash Gupta, for Respondent No.3.
SANTOSH
SUBHASH               Mr. Amogh Singh, a/w Sheetal Mishra and Radhika Kabani,
KULKARNI                   i/b Jeet Gandhi, for Respondent No.4.
Digitally signed by
SANTOSH SUBHASH
KULKARNI
Date: 2026.09.01
10:48:41 +0530
                                                        CORAM:       N. J. JAMADAR, J.
                                                        DATED:       31st AUGUST, 2026

                      PC:-

                      1.     Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioners.


                      2.     There is neither any error apparent on the face of the

                      record nor any other sufficient ground to review the order

                      passed by this Court on 24th July, 2026.


                      3.     The review petition stands dismissed.


                                                                 [N. J. JAMADAR, J.]




                                                      1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.