Bombay High Court

AKSHAY ANIL PAWAR AND ORSversusNIVRUTTI HARISHCHANDRA PAWAR

Decided: 21 August 2026
Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that no error apparent on the face of the record existed and therefore the review petition was dismissed.

Summary

The petitioners, Akshay Anil Pawar and others, filed a review petition challenging an order dated 26th February 2026 passed by the Bombay High Court. The petition alleged that the original order contained errors that warranted a review. The Court examined the petition to determine whether any error apparent on the face of the record existed. It found that there was no such error nor any other sufficient ground to justify a review. Consequently, the Court concluded that the order could not be altered. The review petition was therefore dismissed.

Issues considered

Whether there is any error apparent on the face of the record justifying a review of the order dated 26th February 2026

Subjects

review petition
civil procedure
high court

Judgment

                                                                         4-RPW68-2026.DOC

                                                                                  Santosh

                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                     REVIEW PETITION NO. 68 OF 2026

                      Akshay Anil Pawar And Ors                            ...Petitioners
                                        Versus
                      Nivrutti Harishchandra Pawar                        …Respondent

                      Mr. Amit Patil, a/w Aaditya Nikam, i/b Prathamesh
                            Deshpande, for the Petitioners.
                      Mr. Yogesh Thorat, for the Respondent.
SANTOSH
SUBHASH                                                 CORAM:       N. J. JAMADAR, J.
KULKARNI
Digitally signed by
                                                        DATED:       21st AUGUST, 2026
SANTOSH SUBHASH
KULKARNI
Date: 2026.08.21
15:51:33 +0530
                      PC:-

                      1.     Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioners.


                      2.     There is neither any error apparent on the face of the

                      record nor any other sufficient ground to review the order

                      passed by this Court on 26th February, 2026.


                      3.     The review petition stands dismissed.



                                                                 [N. J. JAMADAR, J.]




                                                      1/1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…