Bombay High Court

TUSHAR TUKARAM RAUT AND ORSversusTHE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR

Decided: 20 August 2026
Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

The revision petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy.

Summary

Petitioners Tushar Tukaram Raut and others filed a revision petition (No. 94 of 2026) seeking leave to withdraw the writ petition pending before the High Court. The petitioners requested that the court permit withdrawal while allowing them to pursue any other appropriate legal remedy. The respondents, the Municipal Commissioner of Pune Municipal Corporation and the State, opposed the withdrawal. The Court, after hearing counsel, allowed the petition to be withdrawn and expressly kept all contentions of the parties open for future reference. Consequently, the petition was withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to avail themselves of any other remedy available under law.

Issues considered

Whether the revision petition may be withdrawn with liberty to approach other appropriate remedies?

Subjects

withdrawal of petition
revision petition
civil appellate jurisdiction
high court procedure
liberty to seek other remedies

Judgment

                                                                                         6-RPW-94-2026 IN WP.DOC


 JYOTI
 RAJESH                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
 MANE
Digitally signed by
                                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
JYOTI RAJESH
MANE
Date: 2026.08.21
17:44:04 +0530
                                          REVISION PETITION NO. 94 OF 2026
                                                        IN
                                          WRIT PETITION NO. 16449 OF 2024


                      Tushar Tukaram Raut And Ors                              ...Petitioner

                             Versus

                      The Municipal Commissioner,
                      Pune Municipal Corporation
                      And Anr                                                  ...Respondents
                                                         _______
                      Mr. Abhijeet Desai a/w. Mr. Amol Jagtap a/w. Mr. Chetan Bhagwat,
                      for Petitioners.
                      Mr. Abhijit P. Kulkarni a/w. Mr. Abhishek Roy, for Respondent No.1-BMC.
                      Mr. P.P.Kakde Addl. G.P. a/w. Ms. P.N. Diwan, AGP, for Respondent-State.
                                                            _______

                                                  CORAM:          G. S. KULKARNI &
                                                                  AARTI SATHE, JJ.

                                                  DATE:           20 AUGUST 2026

                      P.C.

                      1.      Learned counsel for the Revision Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the
                      present Petition with liberty to the Petitioner to avail of such appropriate remedy as
                      may be available in law.
                      2.     Allowed to withdraw.
                      3.     All contentions of the parties are expressly kept open.

                      4.     The Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.




                             (AARTI SATHE, J.)                         (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)


                                                         Page 1 of 1
                      Mane

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…