Bombay High Court
RAHUL DYEING and PRINTING PVT.LTD. SURESH G.KUMAR,DIRECTORversusMAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEV.CORPORATION and ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- TRANSFERRED TO CITY CIVIL COURT
- Bench
- REGISTRY DISPOSAL OS
Holding
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff failed to appear despite being duly called for hearing.
Summary
The plaintiff, Rahul Dyeing & Printing Pvt. Ltd., instituted suit No. 1641 of 2003 against Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and others. The matter was scheduled for hearing on 15 September 2015 and again on 21 September 2015. No representative of the plaintiff appeared on either date despite the court calling the matter out twice. The defendant was represented by Mr. Ankit Kulkarni of Little & Co., while the plaintiff had no counsel. The court observed the plaintiff's continued non‑appearance and consequently dismissed the suit. The order was certified as a true copy of the original judgment.
Subjects
- civil procedure
- non-appearance
- dismissal
Judgment
mub 1 9 S 1641.03.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 1641 OF 2003
Rahul Dyeing & Printing Pvt. Ltd. … Plaintiffs
Vs.
Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation
& Ors. ... Defendants
...
Mr. Ankit Kulkarni i/b. Little & Co. for the defendants.
None for the plaintiffs.
….
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM, J.
DATE : 28.09.2015.
P.C.:
1. Nobody was present for the plaintiff on 15/09/2015 and
21/09/2015 though the matter was called out twice. Even today
nobody is present. Suit therefore, stands dismissed.
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
mub 2 9 S 1641.03.odt
CERTIFICATE
“Certified to be true and correct copy of
original signed Judgment/Order.”
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.