Bombay High Court

WAMAN SUPDU PATIL.versusPRAMILABAI RAGHUNATH PATIL.

Disposal: DISMISSED

Holding

The court granted a one‑week extension to the appellant, with a warning of automatic dismissal if steps are not taken.

Summary

The appellant, Waman Supdu Patil, sought an extension of time to take necessary steps in his appeal, noting that he is deceased. The court, after considering the request, granted a one‑week extension as a final opportunity, setting a deadline of 29‑08‑2026. The order warned that failure to act within this period would result in automatic dismissal of the appeal without further reference. No substantive merits of the appeal were addressed. The matter remains pending pending compliance with the deadline.

Subjects

adjournment
extension of time
appeal procedure

Judgment

                                                 907 SA NO. 126 OF 1993.odt


           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                907 SECOND APPEAL NO. 126 OF 1993

                     Waman Supdu Patil.
                           VERSUS
                  Pramilabai Raghunath Patil.
                               ...
Mr. Aditya Lokhande h/f Mr. Tope Sambhaji S., Advocate for
Appellant
Mr. M N Navandar, Advocate for Respondent
                              ….

                     CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
                        DATE : 21.08.2026
PER COURT :-

1.            Learned Advocate for the Appellant seeks time to take

necessary steps, as the Appellant is no more.


2.           One week’s time is granted as a last chance. Stand over

to 29.08.2026. If the necessary steps are not taken within the

stipulated period, the appeal shall stand dismissed automatically,

without further reference to the Court.



                                      [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ]




HRJadhav                                                           1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…