Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MANAJI GUNDA CHOPADE and OTHERS..versusVIJAY MADHAVRAO NAIK and OTHERS.

Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The Court grants a final adjournment and warns that failure to take necessary steps will lead to dismissal of the appeal.

Summary

The Court was hearing several related appeals, including Second Appeal No. 160 of 1993 and Second Appeal No. 279 of 2004. The appellant sought an adjournment to take necessary steps concerning deceased appellants and a respondent. The Court noted that the appeal was slated for dismissal for non‑compliance. It granted a final adjournment, fixing the matter for 10 September 2026 at 10:30 a.m. and warned that failure to act before that date would result in dismissal without further reference.

Subjects

  • adjournment
  • civil appeal
  • procedural order
  • court scheduling

Judgment

                                              903 SA NO. 160 OF 1993.odt


       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD
             903 SECOND APPEAL NO. 160 OF 1993

               Manaji Gunda Chopade And Others..
                              VERSUS
                Vijay Madhavrao Naik And Others.
                                 ...
Mr. A. R. Lukhe h/f Mr. S. K. Shelke., Advocate for Appellants
Mr. Navin Shah h/f Mr. S. V. Natu, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1
to 3
                               WITH
             SECOND APPEAL NO. 161 OF 1993WITH
             SECOND APPEAL NO. 279 OF 2004WITH
  CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1448 OF 1993 IN SA/161/1993WITH
             SECOND APPEAL NO. 280 OF 2004WITH
     CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1447 OF 1993 IN SA/160/1993
                                ….

                   CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
                     DATE : 28.08.2026
PER COURT :-

SECOND APPEAL NO. 279 OF 2004
1.        Learned Advocate for the Appellant prayed that First

Appeal No.281 of 2004 be tagged with the present appeals.


2.        First Appeal No.281 of 2004 be tagged with the present

appeals and listed on 10.09.2026 at 10:30 a.m., high on board.


SECOND APPEAL NO. 160 OF 1993

1.        Learned Advocate for the Appellant seeks time to take

necessary steps.


                                                                1 of 2
                                   (( 2 ))         903 SA NO. 160 OF 1993


2.         Today, this appeal is fixed for dismissal, as necessary steps

have not been taken by the Appellant in respect of deceased Appellant

Nos.1 and 4 and Respondent No.4.             Considering the prayer for

adjournment to take necessary steps, a last chance is granted.



3.         Stand over to 10.09.2026 at 10:30 a.m. high on board. If

necessary steps are not taken on or before the next date, the appeal

shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.



                                     [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ]
HRJadhav




                                                                   2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.