Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PURUSHOTTAM S/O MADHUKAR KSHIRSAGAR and ANR.versusNAGENDR AS/O MURLIDHAR KSHIRSAGAR

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The appeal is disposed of on the basis of the parties' settlement and a consent decree will be drawn.

Summary

In Second Appeal No. 230 of 2021, the appellants Purshottam S/o Madhukar Kshirsagar and another filed an appeal against the respondent Nagendra S/o Murlidhar Kshirsagar. Both parties appeared before the Court, with the appellants' counsel appearing via video conferencing. The parties informed the Court that they had settled the dispute through mediation, and the mediator submitted a mediation report along with a signed compromise deed. Relying on the consent terms and the parties' submissions, the Court disposed of the second appeal and ordered that a consent decree be drawn in accordance with the settlement. The related civil application was also disposed of.

Subjects

  • mediation
  • consent decree
  • civil appeal
  • settlement
  • court disposal

Judgment

                                                                          67-SA-230-2021.docx


                   VRJ
                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

VAIBHAV
                                     SECOND APPEAL NO.230 OF 2021
RAMESH
JADHAV                                            WITH
Digitally signed
by VAIBHAV
RAMESH JADHAV
                                     CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4 OF 2021
Date: 2026.01.23
15:35:41 +0530
                                                   IN
                                     SECOND APPEAL NO.230 OF 2021

                   Purshottam S/o Madhukar
                   Kshirsagar & Anr.                             … Appellants
                              V/s.
                   Nagendra S/o Murlidhar Kshirsagar             … Respondent



                   Mr. P. G .Sarda (through V.C.) for the appellants.
                   Mr. Ashok B. Tajane for the respondent.



                                             CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.

                                             DATED        : JANUARY 23, 2026
                   P.C.:

                   1.      Learned counsel for the respective parties are present before
                   the Court. Learned counsel for the appellants has appeared
                   through video conferencing.

                   2.      Learned counsel for the respective parties collectively submit
                   that the matter has been settled between the parties before the
                   learned Mediator. The Mediator has filed his mediation report.

                   3.      The compromise pursis forms part of the record. On perusal
                   thereof, it appears to be duly signed by the respective parties.




                                                      1
                                                      67-SA-230-2021.docx


4.   In view of the consent terms and the submissions made by
learned counsel for the respective parties, the Second Appeal
stands disposed of.

5.   A consent decree shall be drawn in terms of the consent
terms.

6.   The Civil Application also stands disposed of.


                                (MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.)




                                2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.