Bombay High Court
SHRI JAGANNATH NIVRUTTI GHARGEversusSMT. KALAVATI BHANUDAS GHARGE and OTHER 1.
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The court accepted the compromise deed, modified the earlier decrees as per its terms, and disposed of the second appeal.
Summary
In a second appeal filed by Jagannath Nivrutti Gharge against Kalavati Bhanudas Gharge and others, the parties submitted a compromise deed dated 28 September 2026, which was executed before a court‑appointed mediator. The court took the deed on record, treating its statements as undertakings. By mutual consent, the court modified the earlier judgments of the Additional District Judge (5 February 1998) and the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Vaduj (29 January 1992) to the extent specified in the compromise. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of in accordance with the compromise, and a decree reflecting the agreement was to be prepared. Any interim applications were also dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether a compromise deed executed before a court‑appointed mediator can be accepted as an undertaking to the court
- Whether the court may modify earlier judgments and decrees by mutual consent of the parties
- Effect of the compromise deed on the pending second appeal
Subjects
- compromise deed
- civil appeal
- decree modification
- mediation
- mutual consent
- court undertaking
Judgment
501-SA-340-1998.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 340 OF 1998
Jagannath Nivrutti Gharge … Appellant
V/s.
Kalavati Bhanudas Gharge and Ors. … Respondents
Adv. Dilip Bodake a/w Sharad Bhosale a/w Viraj Dhumal a/w P.
Dagade, for the appellant.
Adv. N.D. Tiwari a/w Adv. Rohit Rajput, for the respondents.
Smt. Kalavati Bhanudas Gharge and Smt. Shilla Bhanudas Gharge
are present.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATED : OCTOBER 1, 2026
P.C.:
1. Both the counsel have jointly tendered compromise deed
entered into between the parties on 28 September 2026 which,
according to them, was entered before the learned mediator
appointed by this Court by order dated 30 July 2026. Both the
counsel submit that their respective clients are present in Court and
learned counsel for the parties state that they have explained to the
signatories the contents of compromise deed and the signatories have
signed the compromise deed after understanding the contents and
they have signed / thumb impressed the said compromise deed dated
28 September 2026. The said compromise deed dated 28 September
2026 is taken on record and marked as 'X' for identification purposes.
2. For the ease of reference, scan copy of the compromise deed is
reproduced herein below:-
1/5
Rushi
501-SA-340-1998.docx
2/5
Rushi
501-SA-340-1998.docx
3/5
Rushi
501-SA-340-1998.docx
4/5
Rushi
501-SA-340-1998.docx
3. All statements made in the compromise deed are taken as an
undertaking given to this Court. All undertakings are also accepted.
4. By consent, the judgment and decree passed by the Additional
District Judge dated 5 February 1998 and the judgment and decree
passed by Civil Judge, Junior Division, Vaduj, District Satara dated 29
January 1992 stand modified to the extent of what has been stated in
the compromise deed.
5. Accordingly, the Second Appeal stands disposed of in term of
compromise deed dated 28 September 2026.
6. The decree be prepared as per the compromise deed entered
today and taken on record by this Court.
7. In sequel, Interim Applications, if any, are also stand disposed
of.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
5/5
Rushi
Checking your session…