Bombay High Court

MANIK PANDITRAO WASHIMBEversusCHATRABHUJ PANDITRAO WASHIMBE

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The appeal was disposed of as withdrawn upon the parties' compromise and the appellant's request.

Summary

Manik Panditrao Washimbe appealed against Chatrabhuj Panditrao Washimbe in a second appeal before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The parties reached a compromise, resulting in a mutation entry (No. 1704) being effected in the 7/12 extract on 15 August 2026. The appellant, through counsel, sought to withdraw the appeal in light of the settlement. The court considered the request and found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

Whether an appeal can be withdrawn after the parties have reached a compromise and a mutation entry has been effected.

Subjects

appeal
withdrawal
compromise
mutation
land record

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:38705



                                               (1)                  901 sa 367.20

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                              901 SECOND APPEAL NO. 367 OF 2020

                                MANIK PANDITRAO WASHIMBE
                                          VERSUS
                              CHATRABHUJ PANDITRAO WASHIMBE

                                               …..
                          Advocate for the Appellant : Mr. Bagal Vishal A.
                      Advocate for the Respondent : Ms. Aishwarya N. Tanpure
                                               …..

                                         CORAM :      SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
                                         DATE :       27.08.2026

           P.C.:-

           1.          Both the appellant and the respondent are present in the court.


           2.          The learned advocate for the appellant submits that a

           compromise has taken place between the parties. In view of this compromise,

           mutation entry no.1704 has been effected in the 7/12 extract and was

           sanctioned on 15.08.2026. He therefore submits that the appellant desires to

           withdraw the appeal.


           3.          In view of the above, the appeal deserves to be disposed of as

           withdrawn. The appeal is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.


                                                          [SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.]
           mubashir

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…