Bombay High Court
AMOL DATTATRAY PARDESHI AND ORSversusVAIDEHI D/O AMOL PARDESHI THR GUARDIAN VARSH W/O AMOL PARDESHI
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed To be withdrawn
Holding
The appeal was withdrawn and disposed of, with the prior arrangement under the 6 August 2026 order remaining in force.
Summary
The appellants, Amol Dattatray Pardeshi and others, filed an application to withdraw their second appeal (No. 412 of 2024) in the Bombay High Court. The court accepted the withdrawal and ordered the appeal to be disposed of. However, the court directed that the arrangement agreed in paragraph 2 of the order dated 6 August 2026 shall continue to operate despite the withdrawal. No substantive merits of the appeal were considered. The decision was pronounced by Justice Sandeep V. Marne on 20 August 2026.
Subjects
- withdrawal of appeal
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- interim application
- order continuation
Judgment
Vaishnavi 1-SA-412-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 412 OF 2024
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10181 OF 2024
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 412 OF 2024
Amol Dattatray Pardeshi and Ors ...Applicants
V/s.
Vaidehi D/O Amol Pardeshi ...Respondent
________________
Mr. Virendra Tripathi i/b C.K. Tripathi, for Appellants.
Mr. Pankaj Das, for Respondent.
________________
CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATED: 20 AUGUST 2026
P.C.:
1) The learned counsel appearing for the Appellants, tenders an
Application dated 20 August 2026, signed by the Appellants, for
withdrawal of the Appeal. The application is taken on record and marked
‘X’ for identification.
2) The Second Appeal is accordingly permitted to be withdrawn and
disposed of. However, it is directed that the arrangement agreed in
Page No.1 of 2
20 August 2026
Vaishnavi 1-SA-412-2024
paragraph 2 of order dated 6 August 2026 shall continue to operate
notwithstanding the withdrawal of the Appeal.
[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]
Page No.2 of 2
20 August 2026
Checking your session…