Bombay High Court
HARI TUKARAM MAGDUMversusSMT. SONABAI K. MAGDUM
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The second appeals were abated and disposed of because the appellant did not take the required steps or appear before the Court.
Summary
The Court granted the appellant time on 20 August 2026 to produce the legal heirs of the deceased appellant. No steps were taken and the appellant failed to appear when the matter was called. Consequently, the Court held that the second appeals stand disposed of as abated. All pending civil and interim applications were also disposed of accordingly. No substantive merits of the original dispute were addressed.
Issues considered
- Whether the second appeal should be abated due to the appellant's failure to comply with the Court's direction to produce legal heirs
Subjects
- abatement
- second appeal
- civil procedure
- non‑appearance
Judgment
11-SA-1463-2005.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 1463 OF 2005
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2041 OF 2024
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 1463 OF 2005
WITH
SECOND APPEAL NO. 508 OF 2007
WITH
SECOND APPEAL NO. 889 OF 2005
Hari Tukaram Magdum …Appellant
Vs.
Sonabai W/o. Krishna Magdum …Respondent
None for the Appellant
None for the Respondent
s
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 3 SEPTEMBER 2026
P. C. :
1. By an order dated 20 August 2026, time was granted to the
IRESH
MASHAL
Appellant to take steps to bring on record legal heirs of the deceased
Digitally
Appellant.
signed by
IRESH
MASHAL
Date:
2026.09.07
19:59:17
+0530
2. It appears that no steps have been taken to bring on record
legal heirs of the deceased Appellant. None appears on behalf of the
Appellant when the matter is called out.
Iresh
11-SA-1463-2005.doc
3. Second Appeals stand disposed of as abated.
4. In sequel, all pending Civil/Interim Applications stand
disposed of accordingly.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J. )
Iresh
Checking your session…