Bombay High Court

SHRI.KHANDERAO APPASAHEB LONDHEversusNAGESH BABURAO RAMPURE @ MEVEKARI

Disposal: ABATED

Holding

The second appeal stands abated by operation of law.

Summary

The appellant failed to appear when the matter was called out. The court noted that the second appeal was abated against respondent No.2 because the required amendment had not been carried out. By operation of law, the appeal was deemed abated. No further hearing was conducted. The judgment therefore concludes that the appeal stands abated.

Issues considered

Whether the second appeal stands abated due to the appellant's non-appearance and failure to effect the amendment?

Subjects

appeal
abatement
civil procedure
non-appearance

Judgment

                                                           48-SA-524-2017 (C).docx


        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                  CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                 SECOND APPEAL NO. 524 OF 2017
Shri.khanderao Appasaheb Londhe                   ...Appellant
             VERSUS
Nagesh Baburao Rampure @ Mevekari              ...Respondent

None for the Appellant.

Mr. K. K. Sasavade a/w. Mr. Rajvardhan K. Sasavade, Mr. Dhairyashil V.
Pingale, Advocate for Respondents

                                    Coram :       RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

                                    Date      :   AUGUST 27, 2026.

P. C. :

1.        None appears for the appellant when the matter is called out.

2.        The office remarks show that the Second Appeal stands abated

against respondent No.2, as the amendment has not been carried out.

3.        By operation of law, the Second Appeal stands abated.



                                                         (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)




adn                                  1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…