SOU. BHAGYAREKHA SEEDRAM BHOSALE PROPRIETOR M/S REKHA ENTERPRISES THR. POA SEEDRAM DHONDIBA BHOSALEversusSHRI. RAJENDRA MAHADEV THULE PROPRIETOR M/S PURVESH ENGINEERING WORK

                      Sonali Mane                                            21-SA-650-2019.docx



                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                           SECOND APPEAL NO. 650 OF 2019


                      Sou. Bhagyarekha Seedram Bhosale
                      Proprietor M/S Rekha Enterprises Thr.
                      POA Seedram Dhondiba Bhosale                             … Appellant
                               Versus

                      Shri. Rajendra Mahadev Thule Proprietor

                      M/S Purvesh Engineering Work                             … Respondent



                      Ms. Kalyani Mangave i/b Mr. Chetan G. Patil for Appellant.
                      [




                      Mr. Prabhanjan Gujar a/w Ms. Heena Suvarnakar for Respondent.



                                                       CORAM        : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

                                                       DATE         : 22 SEPTEMBER 2026.

                      P.C. :


                      1)            The learned counsel appearing for the Appellant invites
                      attention of the Court to the notices issued to the Appellant. Copies of
                      letters dated 28 August 2026 and 14 October 2024 are taken on record
                      and marked "X" for identification. She submits that the Appellant has
                      not responded to the said notices. She further submits that the Appeal
                      was lodged through the Appellant's husband, who was her constituted
                      attorney. She further submits that the Appellant's husband has
                      apparently passed away. She further submits that, despite making best
                      efforts, contact with the Appellant has not been established.
 MANE
 SONALI
 DILIP
Digitally signed by
MANE SONALI
DILIP
Date: 2026.09.23
15:05:34 +0530                                      ___Page No.1 of 2___
                                                     22 September 2026
Sonali Mane                                                  21-SA-650-2019.docx



2)            It appears that the Appellant has lost interest in prosecuting
the Appeal. If the Appellant is interested in prosecuting the Appeal, she
can apply for restoration of the same. The Appeal is pending since the
year 2019 and cannot be kept pending any longer.



3)            The Second Appeal is accordingly dismissed for want of
prosecution.




                                                       [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]




                                ___Page No.2 of 2___
                                 22 September 2026