Bombay High Court
SHRI. RAJENDRA DATTATRAY KADAM (SINCE DECEASED THR. LRs)versusSMT. LILABAI DATTATRAY KADAM (DIED) AND ORS.
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court granted leave to delete the deceased respondent and disposed of the appeal based on the parties' consent minutes.
Summary
The appellants, heirs of Rajendra Dattatray Kadam, filed a second appeal against Urmilagouri Dilipsinha Mutekar. The appellants sought leave to delete respondent No.3, Pushpa Dattatray Kadam, on the ground that she had died unmarried, making respondent No.2 her legal heir. The Court granted the leave and ordered the amendment to delete the deceased respondent. Both parties submitted consent minutes confirming that their clients had signed and were present in court. The Court accepted the consent minutes as an undertaking and, on that basis, disposed of the second appeal and all interim applications.
Issues considered
- Whether the Court may permit the deletion of a deceased respondent from the pleadings.
- Whether consent minutes signed by the parties can be treated as an undertaking leading to disposal of the appeal.
Subjects
- amendment
- deceased party
- consent minutes
- civil appeal
- party deletion
- procedural order
Judgment
501-sa-67-2016.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO.67 OF 2016
Rajendra Dattatray Kadam
Through his legal heirs & ors ….Appellants
Versus
Urmilagouri Dilipsinha Mutekar ….Respondents.
________________________
P. D. Dalvi a/w. Mr. Tejas V. Shelake, Advocate for the
Appellants.
Mr. N. D. Tiwari & R. S. Rajput, Advocate for
respondent.
Urmilagouri Dilipsinha Mutekar respondent in person present.
_________________________
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 17, 2026
P.C.:
1. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on production board.
2. Mr. Dalvi, on behalf of the appellant, seeks leave to delete
respondent No.3 (Pushpa Dattatray Kadam).
3. He submits that respondent No.3 has died and that she was
unmarried. Her legal heir would be respondent No.2.
4. Leave, as prayed for, is granted.
1/9
adn
501-sa-67-2016.docx
5. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.
6. Both the learned counsel have tendered the consent minutes
of the order dated 17 September 2026.
7. Both the learned counsel submit that their respective clients
have signed the consent minutes of the order. They identify the
signatures of their respective clients and also identify the presence
of their respective clients in Court.
8. In view of the same, the consent minutes of the order are
taken on record and marked as “X” for identification purposes.
9. For ease of reference, the scanned copy of the consent
minutes of the order dated 17 September 2026 is reproduced
hereinbelow:
2/9
adn
501-sa-67-2016.docx
3/9
adn
501-sa-67-2016.docx
4/9
adn
501-sa-67-2016.docx
5/9
adn
501-sa-67-2016.docx
6/9
adn
501-sa-67-2016.docx
7/9
adn
501-sa-67-2016.docx
8/9
adn
501-sa-67-2016.docx
10. All statements made in the consent minutes of the order are
accepted as an undertaking given to this Court. All undertakings
are also accepted.
11. In view of the same, the Second Appeal stands disposed of in
view of the consent minutes of the order dated 17 September
2026.
12. In sequel, all Interim Applications also stand disposed of.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
9/9
adn
Checking your session…