Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SOU. ANJANA AMARSING PAWARversusSHRI. MADHUKAR GANPAT WAGHURILKAR (DECD. THR. LR. SHASHIKALA MADHUKAR WAGHURLIKAR AND ORS. )

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The appeal was withdrawn and disposed of as such.

Summary

The appellant, Anjana Amarsing Pawar, filed a second appeal in the Bombay High Court and, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the second appeal was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive issues were adjudicated as the matter was terminated upon withdrawal. The judgment was signed digitally by Justice Sandeep V. Marne on 3 September 2026.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of appeal
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • high court procedure

Judgment

                      Neeta Sawant                                                 902-SA-859-2016.docx


                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                           CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                           SECOND APPEAL NO. 859 OF 2016


                      Sou. Anjana Amarsing Pawar
                      Through her Son and Constituted Attorney
                      Mr. Pradeep Amarsing Pawar                                 …. Appellant
                                                                                 (Orig. Plaintiff)
                              : Versus :
                      Shri. Madhukar Ganpat Waghurilkar
                      Deceased-through his Legal Heirs
                      Shashikala Madhukar Waghurlikar & Ors.                     …. Respondents
                                                                                 (Orig. Defendants)


                      Ms. Apeksha Tandel a/w. Mr. B.K. Barve i/b. B.K. Barve & Co. for the
                      Appellants.
                      Mr. Tushar Sonawane with Ms. Ekta Patil, for the Respondents.
                      Mr. Pradeep Pawar, C.A. of Appellants present.



                                                              CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
                                                              DATED :       3 SEPTEMBER 2026.
                      P.C :

                      1)       Ms. Tandel, the learned counsel appearing for the Appellant, on
                      instructions, seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the Appeal. Leave
                      granted. Second Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
         Digitally
         signed by
         NEETA
NEETA    SHAILESH
SHAILESH SAWANT
SAWANT   Date:
         2026.09.05
         10:53:17     _____________________________________________________________________________
         +0530



                                                     PAGE NOS. 1 of 2
                                                   Thursday, 3 September 2026
                      Neeta Sawant                                                902-SA-859-2016.docx


                                                                     [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]




         Digitally
         signed by
         NEETA
NEETA    SHAILESH
SHAILESH SAWANT
SAWANT   Date:
         2026.09.05
         10:51:52
         +0530




                      _____________________________________________________________________________

                                                     PAGE NOS. 2 of 2
                                                   Thursday, 3 September 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.