Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

HIGH COURT ON ITS OWN MOTIONversusMR. RAJGOAL DEORA, RETIRED ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, REVENUE

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that the unqualified apology was sufficient to discharge the contempt, leading to the withdrawal of the notice and disposal of the petition.

Summary

The High Court of Bombay entertained a suo motu contempt petition arising from its own order dated 6 May 2026. Retired Additional Chief Secretary Rajagopal Devara filed an affidavit on 29 July 2026 offering an unqualified apology for the alleged contempt. The Court examined the affidavit, found the apology satisfactory, and consequently accepted it. In light of the acceptance, the Court withdrew the notice issued on 6 May 2026. The contempt petition was therefore disposed of without any further proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether the unqualified apology tendered by the alleged contemner extinguishes the contempt proceeding.
  • Whether the notice dated 6 May 2026 should be withdrawn following acceptance of the apology.

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • suo motu jurisdiction
  • apology
  • withdrawal of notice
  • civil appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                               DTG                                                      5-ii-Smcpc-7-2026.doc



                                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                                    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                             SUO MOTU CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 7 OF 2026
                                                                     IN
                                                    WRIT PETITION NO. 173 OF 2022
                               High Court On Its Own Motion                       … Petitioner
                                     V/s.
                               Mr. Rajgoal Deora,
                               Retired Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue        … Respondents
                                               _______________________________________
                               Mr. Satish S. Borulkar a/w Mr. Shrishailya S. Deshmukh for Petitioner in
                               WP/173/2022.

                               Dr. Milind Sathe, Advocate General a/w Mr. Girish Godbole, Senior Advocate
                               and Smt. P.P. Shinde, A.G.P. for-State

                               Mr. Vishwajit Sawant, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Sandeep S. Salunkhe for
                               Respondent Nos. 4 & 7 in WP/173/2022.
                                              _______________________________________
                                                       CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                 KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                       DATE    : 27th August 2026
                               P.C. :

                               1)          The Suo Motu Contempt Petition is initiated in furtherance of

                               Order dated 6th May 2026. Shri Rajagopal Devara, Retired Additional Chief

                               Secretary (Revenue), Mantralaya, Mumbai, has filed Affidavit dated 29 th July

                               2026. We have perused the Affidavit and are satisfied with the contents

                               thereof. The unqualified apology tendered by the contemner is accepted.

                               2)          In view of the above, the Notice dated 6 th May 2026 is

                               withdrawn and the Contempt Petition is accordingly disposed off.



                                           ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                  ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
            Digitally signed
            by
DNYANESHWAR DNYANESHWAR
TULSHIRAM   TULSHIRAM
                                                                                                                1/1
GHUMNAR     GHUMNAR
            Date: 2026.08.29
            14:31:14 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.