Bombay High Court
ICICI BANK LTDversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTR
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
Holding
The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary
In Sales Tax Appeal No. 14 of 2013, ICICI Bank Ltd appealed against the State of Maharashtra. During the pendency of the appeal, the bank paid the entire disputed amount to the State Government. The bank's counsel, Ms. Nikita Badheka, appearing on behalf of the appellant, sought to withdraw the appeal on the basis of full payment. The Court considered the request and found no impediment to withdrawing the appeal after settlement. Consequently, the Court ordered that the appeal be disposed of as withdrawn. The order was subsequently corrected as per the speaking‑to‑minutes dated 13 August 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether an appeal can be withdrawn after the appellant has made full payment of the disputed amount
Subjects
- sales tax
- appeal withdrawal
- full payment
- civil procedure
- high court
Judgment
Digitally
signed by
MAYUR
MAYUR KONDIRAM 2-STXA-14-2013 (OS) -SPK.DOC
KONDIRAM ADANE
ADANE Date:
2026.08.13
18:48:15
+0530
Mayur
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SALES TAX APPEAL NO. 14 OF 2013
ICICI Bank Ltd …Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra …Respondents
Ms. Nikita Badheka, a/w Mr. Parth Badheka, for the Appellant.
CORAM: SUMAN SHYAM &
ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ.
DATED: 11th AUGUST 2026.
PC:-
1. Mr. Parth Badheka, learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner, submits that during the pendency of the appeal, the
entire amount has been paid by the ICICI Bank to the State
Government. Therefore, he has instruction to withdraw the appeal.
The prayer is allowed.
2. The appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn.
(ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.)
{
This order is corrected/modified as per the speaking to minutes order dated 13st August 2026.
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.