Bombay High Court
KANCHAN SATISH KRIPALANIversusNEETA THAKURDAS THARANI (DECEASED)
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
Holding
Leave to withdraw the testamentary petition was granted, resulting in the petition and the suit being disposed of.
Summary
The petitioner, Kanchan Satish Kripalani, filed a testamentary petition seeking to withdraw the suit concerning the estate of the deceased Neeta Thakurdas Tharani. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Shrey Fatterpekar, applied to the High Court for leave to withdraw the petition. The sole issue before the court was whether the petitioner could be permitted to withdraw the pending testamentary suit. The court, after considering the application, disposed of the petition as withdrawn and consequently ordered the testamentary suit to be disposed of as well. No further applications remained for consideration, and the matter was closed.
Issues considered
- Whether leave may be granted to the petitioner to withdraw the pending testamentary petition
Subjects
- testamentary petition
- withdrawal
- probate
- succession law
- court procedure
Judgment
1/1 24 TP-207-2019.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
Digitally
signed by
SAIRAJ
SAIRAJ
SANJAY
SANJAY
KARANDE
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 207 OF 2019
KARANDE Date:
2026.09.01
10:41:39
+0530
Kanchan Satish Kripalani … Petitioner
Vs.
Neeta Thakurdas Tharani (Deceased) … Respondent
_______
Mr. Shrey Fatterpekar, Ms. Zayaa Daver i/by M. Mulla Associates for Petitioner.
Mr. Satish J. Agarwal for Caveator.
_______
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE : 31st AUGUST 2026.
P.C.
1. Mr. Fatterpekar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner
seeks leave to withdraw the captioned Testamentary Petition.
2. The Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
3. The Testamentary Suit is accordingly disposed of.
4. Nothing survives for consideration in pending applications, if any, and the
same stand disposed of.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
Sairaj
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.