Bombay High Court

RAMESHWAR VALMIK RAVATEversusPOOJA RAMESHWAR RAVATE AND ANOTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court held that the petition is infructuous due to the passage of time and therefore disposed of it.

Summary

Rameshwar Valmik Ravate filed a writ petition (No. 10022 of 2015) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Pooja Rameshwar Ravate and others. The petitioner sought relief, but the learned counsel argued that the passage of time had rendered the issues in the petition infructuous. The Court considered whether the petition remained maintainable in view of the alleged lapse of time. Relying on the counsel's submission, the Court found that the petition could no longer be entertained. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.

Issues considered

Whether the writ petition remains maintainable despite the lapse of time rendering the issues infructuous

Subjects

writ petition
infructuous
lapse of time
court disposal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:41102



                                                                      55 WP No.10022.2015
                                                  -1-

                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 10022 OF 2015

                                   RAMESHWAR VALMIK RAVATE
                                           VERSUS
                             POOJA RAMESHWAR RAVATE AND ANOTHERS
                                                 ***
              Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Nilanjan Pande h/f Senior
              Advocate Mr. Rajendra S. Deshmukh
                                                 ***

                                   CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                      Date : 4th September, 2026

              PER COURT :-


              1.              The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by

              passage of time, the issues involved in the petition have become

              infructuous.



              2.              In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed

              of as infructuous.



                                                        (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)



              Omkar Joshi

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…