Bombay High Court
DHANRAJ RAJDHAR NIKAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The court held that Respondent No.2 must decide the petitioner’s representation on its merits within eight weeks of receipt of the order.
Summary
Dhanraj Rajdhar Nikam filed a writ petition (No. 10076 of 2026) against the State of Maharashtra and others, seeking relief concerning a representation he submitted on 28 October 2025. The petition was heard by a two‑judge bench of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad. The court directed Respondent No.2 to consider the petitioner’s representation on its merits and to render a decision within eight weeks of receiving the order. No substantive discussion of the merits or legal arguments was recorded in the excerpt. The order effectively disposes of the writ petition by imposing a time‑bound duty on the respondent.
Issues considered
- Whether Respondent No.2 is required to decide the petitioner’s representation dated 28/10/2025 on its merits within a specified time frame
Subjects
- writ petition
- representation
- administrative decision
- court order
- timely disposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:37407-DB
1 107-WP-10076-26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 10076 OF 2026
DHANRAJ RAJDHAR NIKAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND
OTHERS
...
Mr. D. R. Jaybhar, Advocate h/f Mr. Shubham D. Jayabhar, Advocate
for the Petitioner
Mr. V. M. Kagne, AGP for Respondents/State
...
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 17th AUGUST, 2026
PER COURT :
. The writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent
No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated
28/10/2025, on it’s own merit, within a period of eight weeks from
the date of receipt of copy of this order.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
SVH
Checking your session…