Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MADHAVI MARUTI PATIL AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND ANR

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is deemed infructuous and is therefore disposed of.

Summary

The petitioners, Madhavi Maruti Patil and another, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief and requested that the matter be referred for mediation as part of a mediation drive. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and others, opposed the referral. The court was listed to consider whether any settlement was possible and whether the petition could be sent to mediation. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petition had become infructuous, meaning there was no longer any live dispute to adjudicate. After hearing, the judges held that the petition was indeed infructuous and therefore disposed of without further proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition can be referred for mediation under the ongoing mediation drive
  • Whether the petition remains a live cause of action or has become infructuous

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • mediation
  • infructuous
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • settlement

Judgment

2026:BHC-KOL:9114-DB

                                                                       34-WP-10079-2023(C).doc


                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                    WRIT PETITION NO. 10079 OF 2023

               Madhavi Maruti Patil And Another                            ...Petitioners.
                       Versus
               The State of Maharashtra and Others                         ...Respondents.

                                                ——————
               Mr. Dheeraj Patil, for the Petitioners.
               Ms. Tejas J. Kapre, AGP for the Respondent-State.
                                                ——————

                                                  Coram :     Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
                                                              Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
                                                  Date      : September 22, 2026.
               P. C. :

               1.        This matter was listed to examine whether there is any possibility

               of settlement, so that the Petition can be referred for mediation during

               the mediation drive.

               2.        Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners submits that the

               Petition has been rendered infructuous.

               3.        The Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.




                [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.]                         [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]




               Jamadar - SL                        1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.