Bombay High Court
SUDAM RAVINDRA DESLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition cannot be maintained as the local body tenure has ended, leaving no cause of action.
Summary
Sudam Ravindra Desle filed a writ petition challenging a no‑confidence motion passed by the majority of village panchayat members against him. The motion related to the local body’s tenure for the period 2020‑25. The Court observed that the tenure had already expired, rendering the motion and any relief sought moot. Consequently, the petition was found to lack any surviving cause of action. The Court therefore disposed of the writ petition.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition challenging a no‑confidence motion is maintainable when the tenure of the local body concerned has already expired
Subjects
- no‑confidence motion
- local body tenure
- writ petition
- cause of action
- petition disposed
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:46091
1
907 WP 10120 OF 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
907 WRIT PETITION NO. 10120 OF 2024
SUDAM RAVINDRA DESLE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR
AND ANOTHER
...
Mr. M. D. Deshpande h/f. Mr. L.V. Sangit, Advocate for the
Petitioner
Mr. S. N. Kendre, AGP for Respondent No.1 – State
Mr. A. N. Deshpande h/f. Mr. A. S. Sawant, Advocate for
Respondent No.2
…
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATED : 1st October 2026
P.C. :-
. The petition arises out of no-confidence motion moved
by the majority of the village panchayat members against the
petitioner. This was in respect of the local body tenure from
2020-25. Apparently, the tenure of the local body is already
over. In view of this, nothing survives in this petition.
2. The Writ Petition is disposed of.
( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. )
PRW
Checking your session…