Bombay High Court
M/S. SAI RYDAM REALTORS PVT LTD THRU AUTHORISEDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU SECRETARY AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court held that the writ petition is dismissed and the demand for the excess Fire Protection Fund amount must be reconsidered, with the deposited sum remaining subject to the final decision on the petitioner's objection.
Summary
Sai Rydam Realtors Pvt. Ltd. applied for a Fire No Objection Certificate and the competent authority fixed the Fire Protection Fund contribution at Rs.52,44,730. Respondents 2 to 4 demanded a higher payment of Rs.85,91,000, which the petitioner deposited under protest to avoid project delays. The petitioner filed a detailed objection on 19 June 2026 before the Municipal Commissioner and the Chief Fire Officer, seeking a refund of the excess amount. The Court observed that the demand must be revisited in light of the objection and that the deposited amount will remain pending until a final decision on the objection. Consequently, the Court declined to entertain the writ petition and ordered the petition to be disposed, leaving the matter to be decided on the merits of the objection.
Issues considered
- Whether the excess amount demanded by the respondents for the Fire Protection Fund is payable by the petitioner
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to a refund of the amount deposited under protest
- Whether the High Court can intervene in the dispute over the Fire Protection Fund assessment
Subjects
- Fire Protection Fund
- Fire No Objection Certificate
- Municipal Corporation
- Excess demand
- Refund
- Protest deposit
- Writ petition
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
PDP 42-WP-10123-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally
signed by
PRAVIN
PRAVIN
DASHARATH
PANDIT
DASHARATH
PANDIT
Date:
WRIT PETITION NO. 10123 OF 2026
2026.09.11
19:43:09
+0530
Sai Rydam Realtors Pvt. Ltd. .. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
...
Mr. Murtaza Najmi a/w Shambhu Jha, Sushil Upadhaya, Afsar
Ansari, Farida Najmi, Nancy Kanungo, Suraj, Arefa Siddiquie, Nasrah
Ansari for the Petitioner.
Mrs. Neha S. Bhide, Govt. Pleader with Mr. K. B. Dighe, Addl. Govt.
Pleader and Mrs. Pratibha Gavhane, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and
5-State.
...
CORAM : MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, CJ. &
ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.
DATE : 11th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
P.C. :
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Issuance of
Notice is dispensed with in view of the order proposed to be passed
by this Court.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while
processing the application for grant of Fire No Objection Certificate in
respect of its development project, the Competent Authority
determined the amount payable towards Fire Protection Fund at
Rs.52,44,730/- in accordance with the applicable statutory
provisions. However, Respondent Nos.2 to 4 refused to accept the
amount determined by the competent authority and instead
1
PDP 42-WP-10123-2026.doc
demanded payment of Rs.85,91,000/- towards Fire Protection Fund.
The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that since the
Fire No Objection Certificate was an indispensable statutory
requirement of the petitioner’s development project, the petitioner
deposited the said amount under protest in order to avoid delay and
disruption of the project. He submits that without any rationale and
cogent reasons, the demand had been made in arbitrary manner.
Inspite of the fact that the petitioner has filed detailed objection on
19th June, 2026 before the Municipal Commissioner, Vasai Virar City
Municipal Corporation and the Chief Fire Officer, Fire & Emergency
Services Department, the respondents failed and neglected to refund
the excess amount.
3. At present we find that such demand by the Respondents
is to be re-visited in the light of the objection so raised by the
petitioner on 19th June, 2026. The same be done by the said
Respondents in accordance with law.
4. Considering the factual situation as emerged before us, we
are not inclined to entertain the instant Petition. The petitioner has
already deposited the amount and the same would be subject to the
final decision on the objection so raised by the petitioner on 19 th
June, 2026.
5. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is Disposed of.
[ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE]
2
Checking your session…