Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHASHIKALA KASHINATH RATHOD AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court held that, following its earlier decision in Writ Petition No.9389 of 2022, the State must compensate the petitioners for the violation.

Summary

The petitioners, Shashikala Kashinath Rathod and others, filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra alleging a violation of their rights that warranted monetary compensation. The petition raised the issue of whether the State was liable to pay compensation for the alleged breach. The Court noted that the matter was already decided in Writ Petition No.9389 of 2022, a precedent to which Justice Nitin B. Suryawanshi had previously contributed. Relying on the reasoning in that earlier order, the Court found the State responsible for the harm suffered by the petitioners. Consequently, the Court allowed the writ petition and directed the State to pay Rs.50,00,000 to the petitioners within twelve weeks, allowing any prior payments to be set off.

Issues considered

  • Whether the State of Maharashtra is liable to pay compensation to the petitioners for the alleged violation of their rights

Subjects

  • compensation
  • writ petition
  • state liability
  • human rights
  • civil remedy

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:43000-DB


                                                  *1*                    910-wp-10133-2026


                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                  WRIT PETITION NO.10133 OF 2026
                       SHASHIKALA KASHINATH RATHOD AND OTHERS
                                            VERSUS
                 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY
                                          AND OTHERS
                                               …
                Mr. Dhore Akshay Raosaheb, Advocate for the petitioner
                Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP for Respondent/State
                Mr. D. S. Bagul, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 4
                                               ...
                                   CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI &
                                             ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
                                   DATE : 16th SEPTEMBER 2026
                P. C. :-
                1.         Issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by the
                decision of this Court in Writ Petition No.9389 of 2022, to which
                one of us (Justice Nitin B. Suryawanshi) was a member.

                2.         For the reasons stated in the said order, Writ Petition is
                allowed.

                3.         The Respondents are directed to pay compensation of
                Rs.50,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty Lakh) to the petitioners within a
                period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of
                this order. If any compensation is paid to the petitioner in the
                past, the same may be appropriated while paying the
                compensation.




                (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)                (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)


                Narwade


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.