Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MUMBAI BUS MALAK SANGATHANA (REG.) THROUGH ITS SECRETARYversusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The petition is allowed to be withdrawn as the grievance no longer subsists due to the implementation of automated testing stations under the amended statutory regime.

Summary

The petitioner, Mumbai Bus Malak Sangathana, filed a writ petition seeking directions to the State of Maharashtra and the Transport Commissioner to ensure timely fitness certification of its members' vehicles, alleging delays in vehicle inspection. The respondents produced an affidavit indicating that the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways issued Notification GSR 272(E) mandating compulsory testing at Automated Testing Stations (ATS) from April 2023 for heavy vehicles and June 2024 for medium and light transport vehicles, and that ATS were operational in 19 of 60 Regional Transport Offices with others under setup. The court observed that the government had taken appropriate steps to automate vehicle testing, rendering the petition filed in 2018 moot. Consequently, the court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the petition, granting liberty to approach the court again if the grievance persists despite ATS installation. The petition was therefore allowed to be withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • What relief, if any, is appropriate where a petition seeks directions for vehicle fitness certification but the statutory framework has been altered by a subsequent government notification?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • fitness certificate
  • vehicle inspection
  • Automated Testing Stations
  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • writ petition
  • administrative law
  • government notification

Judgment

                                    1 of 3                  12-WP-10147-2018
 Sagar Magar

                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                  WRIT PETITION NO. 10147 OF 2018

Mumbai Bus Malak Sangathana
(Reg.) Through Its Secretary                             … Petitioner
      Versus
Union Of India Through Its
Secretary And Ors.                                       ... Respondents

                            __________
Mr. Suhas Deokar a/w Mr. Tanmay Shembavnekar a/w Mr.
Shravan Sul for Petitioner.
Mr. A. I. Patel, AGP a/w Tanu Bhatia, AGP for the Respondent Nos.
2 and 3 -State.
Mr. Sachinkumar Giri, Deputy R.T.O. is present.
Mr. Jayesh Chiplunkar, Asst. M.V.P. is present.
                            __________

                     CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL &
                             RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, JJ.
                     DATE     : 2nd SEPTEMBER 2026
PC :

1)             The grievance in this petition is that, the vehicles of the

Petitioner’s Members were not getting the fitness certificate

expeditiously and there was delay in undertaking the examination

of those vehicles. The petition is filed mainly with the prayer for

directions to the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3                  i.e. State of

Maharashtra and Transport Commissioner, Maharashtra State, to

make proper provisions for vehicle inspection so that owner would
                                2 of 3                12-WP-10147-2018


get fitness certificate as and when it is required. There are other

ancillary prayers made in the petition.


2)         Learned AGP tendered the copy of the Affidavit dated

31st August 2026 affirmed by the Joint Transport Commissioner

(Enforcement-1), Bandra (East). The affidavit mentions that, the

Ministry Road Transport and Highways, Government of India

(MoRTH), vide its Notification No. GSR 272(E) dated 5 th April

2022, directed that, testing of transport vehicles for the purposes

of grant of Certificate of Fitness under Section 56 of the Motor

Vehicles Act, 1988 shall compulsorily be conducted through

Automated Testing Stations, in a phased manner, namely (i) in

respect of Heavy Goods Vehicles/Heavy Passenger Motor Vehicles,

with effect from 1st April 2023 and (ii) in respect of Medium Goods

Vehicles/Medium Passenger Motor Vehicles and Light Motor

Vehicles (Transport), with effect from 1 st June 2024, and that the

manual testing of vehicles by the offices of the Regional Transport

Officers/Motor Vehicles Inspectors on Brake Testing Tracks was

progressively discontinued, substituting by testing at Automated

Testing Stations. The Affidavit goes on to mention that, as to how

policy has been implemented. It is mentioned that, as on 19th
                                                               3 of 3                  12-WP-10147-2018


                              August 2026, the Automated Testing Stations have already been

                              made operational in respect of 19 Regional Transport Offices out of

                              60 offices in the State of Maharashtra. In respect of 32 offices, the

                              process of setting up and operationalizing the ATS is at various

                              stages of completion.


                              3)          Thus, we find that, Government is taking appropriate

                              steps. The situation is likely to improve with automation by

                              installation of automated testing centres. Therefore, the present

                              petition which is filed in the year 2018 does not survive as of

                              today, in view of the facts that, there is a marked change in the

                              process of testing of vehicles. The Affidavit is taken on record.


                              4)          In view of this affidavit, learned counsel for the

                              Petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this

                              petition with liberty to take appropriate steps in case the grievance

                              still persists in future in spite of installation of automated testing

                              centres. Permission is granted. The Petition is allowed to be

                              withdrawn with such liberty.
           Digitally signed
           by SAGAR
SAGAR   SANTOSH
SANTOSH MAGAR
MAGAR   Date:
        2026.09.07
           11:35:32 +0530     (RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.)            (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.