Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

TANZILA IMRAN KHAN @ TANZILA RASHID SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Tanzila Imran Khan, filed a writ petition on 23 February 2021 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or her counsel at the hearing on 29 August 2026. The court noted that the petitioner had not taken any steps to circulate the petition since its filing, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court held that the petition could not be proceeded with due to non‑prosecution. The petition was therefore dismissed. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to appear and does not take steps to pursue a writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • high court

Judgment

                 ssm                                                     65-wp1015.2021.doc

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 1015 OF 2021

            Tanzila Imran Khan
            @ Tanzila Rashid Shaikh                                      …..Petitioner

                     Vs.

            The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                              …..Respondents

                                ____________________________________

            None for the Petitioner.
            Smt. P.P. Shinde APP, for the Respondent-State.
                              ____________________________________

                                               CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                            KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                 DATE :     29th AUGUST, 2026.


            P.C.:-

            1)             None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

            2)             Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

            23rd February, 2021, neither the Petitioner nor her Advocate has taken any

            steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

            2.1)           It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

            Petition.

            3)             Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                       (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                          (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                           1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.09.07
          17:01:08 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.