Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAJESAHEB VENKATRAO GORE AND OTHERSversusTHE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER ROR AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition was disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioners Rajesaheb Venkatrao Gore and others filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Competent Authority that rejected a stay. During the proceedings, the parties reached an amicable settlement before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. The petitioners' counsel informed the court that, in view of the settlement, there was nothing left to pursue. The court accepted the submission and ordered the petition to be disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive legal issues were adjudicated as the matter was settled out of court.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition remains maintainable after the parties have reached an amicable settlement before the Debt Recovery Tribunal

Subjects

  • Writ Petition
  • Debt Recovery Tribunal
  • stay order
  • settlement
  • withdrawal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:34170
                                                                        940.odt


               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                          BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                           940 WRIT PETITION NO. 1016 OF 2024

                        Rajesaheb Venkatrao Gore And Others
                                      VERSUS
                    The Additional Commissioner Ror And Others
                                        …..
          Mr. Godbharle Vinod D., Advocate for the Petitioners
          Mr. V. M. Chate, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 - State
                                        …..

                                         CORAM :          NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.
                                         DATE         :   06.08.2026

          PER COURT :

          1.      The learned Advocate for the Petitioners submits that, the
          parties have arrived at an amicable settlement before the Debt
          Recovery Tribunal (DRT). He further submits that, in view of the
          said development, nothing survives in the Petition, which is filed
          against the order passed by the Competent Authority rejecting the
          stay.


          2.      The learned AGP appears for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.


          3.      None for the other Respondents.


          4.      In view of the above, the Petition stands disposed off as
          withdrawn.



                                                    [NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.]

          Sameer/August-2026




                                            1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.