Bombay High Court
THE AURANGABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AURANGABADversusTHE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, AURANGABAD AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner’s counsel failed to appear.
Summary
The Aurangabad Municipal Corporation filed writ petition No. 10192 of 2014 against the Deputy Director, Aurangabad and others. The petition was listed before the Hon'ble Justice Sachin S. Deshmukh on 9 September 2026. The counsel representing the petitioner was absent on the scheduled date. The Court noted the non-appearance and recorded that no effort was made to prosecute the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner’s counsel’s non-appearance?
Subjects
- writ petition
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- procedural default
- court procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41722
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
49 WRIT PETITION NO. 10192 OF 2014
The Aurangabad Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad
VERSUS
The Deputy Director, Aurangabad And Others
.......
Mr. V.M. Jaware, A.G.P. for State
....…
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 9th SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
Recording absence of the counsel for the petitioner on 2 nd
September 2026, this petition was kept today. Even when the matter is
called out today, none present for the petitioner. As such, the petition
stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
fmp/-
Checking your session…