Bombay High Court
Vijay Sadhuram Pawar and OrsversusUlhasnagar Municipal Corporation
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court allowed the petition to be withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking substantive relief against the Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners applied for leave of the Court to withdraw the petition. The Court examined whether such a withdrawal could be permitted without prejudice to the respondents. It allowed the petition to be withdrawn, directing the petitioners to pursue any other remedy they may have. All contentions of the parties were expressly kept open, and no merits of the original relief were adjudicated.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition filed under Article 226 may be withdrawn by the petitioners.
Subjects
- Article 226
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
907-WP-10237-26.DOC
rsk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.10237 OF 2026
Vijay Sadhuram Pawar and Ors ...Petitioners
Vs
Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation ...Respondent
_________
Mr. Akash Menon a/w. Ms. Isha Porje for the Petitioners.
Mr. Suresh M. Kamble for Respondent.
__________
CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI &
DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.
DATE: 19 AUGUST 2026.
P.C.
1. This petition is filed under Article 226 for substantive relief.
2. After this petition was heard for some time, learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw this petition.
3. We allow this petition to be withdrawn to enable the petitioners to
espouse, whatever remedy the petitioners have.
4. All contentions of all parties are expressly kept open.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)
Digitally signed
by RAJESHWARI
RAJESHWARI SUBODH
SUBODH KARVE
KARVE Date:
2026.08.21
11:22:09 +0530
Page 1 of 1
19 August 2026
Checking your session…