Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ASHUTOSH S/O SHARAD SANGLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The writ petitions were dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners, Ashutosh Sangle, filed writ petitions No. 1024 and 1025 of 2021 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioners failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petitions after 7 January 2022. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the matters. Consequently, the court held that the petitions could not proceed in the absence of prosecution. Both writ petitions were therefore dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear or take steps to pursue the petition.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                ssm                                                 66-wp1024.2021.doc

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                               WRIT PETITION NO. 1024 OF 2021

                                               WITH

                               WRIT PETITION NO. 1025 OF 2021

           Ashutosh S/o. Sharad Sangle                       …..Petitioner
                 Vs.
           The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                   …..Respondents
                           ____________________________________

           None for the Petitioner.
           Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre APP, for the Respondent-State.
           Adv. S.K. Halwasia a/w Smt. S.S. Halwasia for the Respondent-UOI in WP
           No.1024 of 2021.
                             ____________________________________

                                           CORAM :     A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                       KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                             DATE :    29th AUGUST, 2026.
           P.C.:-

           1)           None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

           2)           Record indicates that, after 7th January, 2022, neither the

           Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any steps to circulate the Petitions,

           even once.

           2.1)         It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

           Petition.

           3)           Both the Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution.



          Digitally (KAMAL
                    signed KHATA, J.)                        (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                      1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.09.07
          17:01:07 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.