Bombay High Court

VIJAY VENKATRAO PATILversusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court held that the writ petition was infructuous and therefore dismissed.

Summary

Vijay Venkatrao Patil filed a writ petition (No. 10269 of 2026) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Union of India and others. The petition was presented by Ms. Shradha Patil on behalf of Mr. P.C. Bhagure, while the State was represented by Mr. V.M. Kagne, AGP, and Respondent No.1 by Mr. U.B. Bondar. The Court examined the petition and concluded that it was infructuous, meaning it did not raise any maintainable claim or relief. Accordingly, the Court held that there was no ground to entertain the petition. The writ petition was therefore disposed of as infructuous.

Subjects

writ petition
infructuous
dismissal
maintainability

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:36556-DB


                                                   {1}                    31-wp-10269-2026

                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                            BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                     31 WRIT PETITION NO. 10269 OF 2026

                                        Vijay Venkatrao Patil
                                              VERSUS
                                  The Union Of India And Others
                                                  ...
              Ms. Shradha Patil h/f Mr. P.C. Bhagure, Advocate for the Petitioner
              Mr. V.M. Kagne, AGP for State
              Mr. U.B. Bondar, Advocate for Respondent No. 1
                                                .......

                                          CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                   ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.


                                             DATE : 17th AUGUST, 2026
              PER COURT :

              1.       Learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the petition is

              rendered infructuous.

              2.       The Writ Petition, is, therefore, disposed of as infructuous.



              (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)                   (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)




              Bhagyawant Punde

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…