Bombay High Court
AARYAN SUNIL MAHAJAN THROU. GUARDIAN SUNIL ADHAR MAHAJANversusUNION OF INDIA THORU. MINISTRY OF EXTENRAL AFFAIRS AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petitioner cannot be considered an NRI for admission purposes without a certificate issued by an Indian mission, and the court will not relax the statutory requirement.
Summary
The petitioner, an Indian national who had previously resided in the United Kingdom, applied for a Non‑Resident Indian (NRI) certificate to qualify for admission to a B.Tech. programme under the NRI category. He was unable to appear physically before the Indian High Commission in London because he had been deported, and the Commission’s policy requires physical presence for issuance of the certificate. The petitioner sought a court direction for the Ministry of External Affairs to obtain the certificate on his behalf and, alternatively, to allow his admission without the certificate. The Ministry’s affidavit explained that under its 2025 guidelines, an NRI certificate can be issued only after verification of eligibility and physical presence, and there is no mechanism for issuance in absentia. The Court noted that the Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions and Fees) Act, 2015, defines an NRI as a person who possesses a certificate issued by an Indian mission, and therefore the petitioner could not be treated as an NRI without such a certificate. Consequently, the petition for admission without the certificate was rejected and the writ petition was dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner can be deemed a Non‑Resident Indian for admission purposes without an NRI certificate issued by an Indian mission.
- Whether the High Commission of India, London may issue an NRI certificate in absentia contrary to its guidelines.
- Whether the court can direct the Ministry of External Affairs to obtain an NRI certificate on behalf of the petitioner.
Legislation cited
- Income Tax Act, 1961 — s. Section 6
Subjects
- NRI certificate
- Admission eligibility
- Maharashtra private educational institutions act
- Income Tax Act
- Writ petition
- High Court of Bombay
- Ministry of External Affairs
- Physical presence requirement
Judgment
902-wp-10313-2026.doc
jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.10313 OF 2026
JITENDRA
SHANKAR
NIJASURE
Digitally signed by
JITENDRA SHANKAR
NIJASURE Aaryan Sunil Mahajan ...Petitioner
Date: 2026.09.02
14:52:21 +0530
Versus
Union of India and Ors. ...Respondents
----------
Mr. Nikhil Wadikar (Thru V.C.) with Parth Katira for the Petitioner.
Mr. S.H. Kankal, AGP for the State.
Mr. Anand Kulkarni, for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – Union of India.
Mr. Sameer Khedekar, for Respondent No.3.
----------
CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA AND
FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 1ST SEPTEMBER, 2026.
O R D E R:
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard by consent
of parties.
2. By this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has sought a direction
to Respondent No.1 to issue an NRI Certificate to the Petitioner in
accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible. Further,
direction is sought against Respondent Nos.3 and 4 to permit the
1/7
902-wp-10313-2026.doc
Petitioner to participate in the admission process for the Bachelor of
Technology (B.Tech.) Course for the Academic Year 2026-27 under
the Non Resident Indian (NRI) category without insisting upon the
production of an NRI Certificate issued by the Embassy/High
Commission/Consulate of India in the United Kingdom, and to accept
such other documentary evidence as may satisfactorily establish the
Petitioner’s entitlement to be considered under the said category.
3. On the previous date, when the Writ Petition had come
up, we had considered the submission of Mr. Wadikar, learned
Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, that the passport of the
Petitioner showed that the Petitioner had met the criteria of NRI by
residing in UK for over a period of 182 days. The Petitioner, through
his father, had submitted communications/emails addressed to the
High Commission of India, UK regarding issuance of NRI Certificate
to the Petitioner and these communications/emails have been met
with a response that the High Commission of India in the UK cannot
issue NRI Certificate or Status Letter if the Petitioner is outside the
UK. Further, that the Petitioner must be physically present in the
issuing country on the date of issuance of NRI certificate. The
Petitioner and his family, having been deported from the UK, were
2/7
902-wp-10313-2026.doc
unable to meet these requisites.
4. We had accordingly noted the predicament faced by the
Petitioner and considered it appropriate for the Petitioner to address
a communication to Respondent No. 1 (Ministry of External Affairs)
to assist the Petitioner in obtaining an NRI Certificate from the High
Commission of India in the UK without insistence upon physical
presence of the Petitioner. The Respondent No. 1 was also directed to
assist the Petitioner for obtaining an NRI Certificate, for which they
were directed to address a communication to the High Commission
of India, UK, setting out the peculiar circumstances of the Petitioner’s
case and making a request for physical presence of the Petitioner for
issuance of NRI Certificate to be dispensed with.
5. These directions were accordingly carried out by the
Petitioner and Respondent No. 1 (Ministry of External Affairs). An
Affidavit-in-Reply has been filed by Respondent No. 1. In the said
Affidavit, the deponent working as Under Secretary in Respondent
No. 1 (Ministry of External Affairs) has referred to the guidelines
issued by the Ministry of External Affairs dated 30th July 2025
governing issuance of NRI Certificates by Indian Embassies, High
3/7
902-wp-10313-2026.doc
Commissions, and Consulates abroad. Under these guidelines, an NRI
Certificate may be issued to an Indian national/Indian passport
holder who qualifies as non-resident under Section 6 of the Income
Tax Act, 1961, upon verification of the requisite documentary
evidence by the concerned Indian Mission/Post. It is further stated in
the said Affidavit that, in the present case, the NRI Certificate sought
for the purpose of sponsoring the Petitioner’s education for Academic
Year 2026–2027 would therefore need to be established for that
Academic Year. Further, the Petitioner’s father had returned to India
on 2nd July 2026, following expiry of his visa, and had not thereafter
obtained a visa or residential status in any foreign country during the
relevant Academic Year/financial year. The NRI/Residential Status for
the relevant financial year cannot be established merely on the basis
of his past residence in the United Kingdom. Further, the deponent
has stated that there is no precedent or prescribed mechanism within
the Ministry for issuance of an NRI certificate by an Indian
Mission/Post abroad in absentia, i.e., without the physical presence
of the Applicant before the concerned Indian Mission/Post. The
existing procedure followed by the High Commission of India,
London, accordingly requires the Applicant to be physically present in
the issuing country.
4/7
902-wp-10313-2026.doc
6. Accordingly, it is submitted that in view of the aforesaid
position, and particularly in the absence of fulfillment and
verification of the prescribed eligibility requirements, High
Commission of India, London, is presently not in a position to issue
an NRI certificate in respect of the Petitioner’s sponsor merely on the
basis of past residence in the United Kingdom and without the
Applicant being physically present before the Mission. The said
Affidavit in Reply of Respondent No. 1 is accordingly taken on record.
7. It is pertinent to note that amended sub-clause (n) of
Section 2 of the Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional
Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions and Fees) Act,
2015 provides as under:-
“2 (n) Non Resident Indian (NRI) means, a person
who is “not ordinarily resident” under sub-section
(6) of Section 6 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and
has been issued a Non-Resident Indian Certificate
accordingly by an Indian Mission or Post Abroad
and includes his child or ward as defined in the
Guardians and Wards Act, 1890”.
8. Accordingly, for being a Non-Resident Indian, the
Petitioner would necessarily have to possess a Non-Resident Indian
5/7
902-wp-10313-2026.doc
Certificate which has been issued to him by an Indian Mission or Post
abroad. Thus, the Petitioner in the present case has been unable to fit
into the NRI category, as he is not in possession of an NRI certificate.
9. Mr. Wadikar has accordingly pressed for prayer clause
(b) of the Writ Petition, namely to permit the Petitioner to participate
in the admission process for the Bachelor of Technology (B.Tech.)
Course for the Academic Year 2026–2027, under the NRI category
without insisting upon production of an NRI Certificate issued by the
Embassy/High Commission/Consulate of India in the United
Kingdom.
10. We are unable to grant such a prayer sought for by the
Petitioner, particularly considering the amended sub-clause (n) of
Section 2 of the Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional
Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions and Fees) Act,
2015, which would be applicable in the present case.
11. Mr. Wadikar has submitted that the Petitioner, in the
event of not being considered in the NRI category, would be left
without fitting into any category for participating in the admission
6/7
902-wp-10313-2026.doc
process for the Bachelor of Technology (B.Tech.) Course for the
Academic Year 2026–2027.
12. This is an unfortunate predicament faced by the
Petitioner. However, considering the requirement of Respondent No.
3 (State Common Entrance Test Cell) for production of an NRI
Certificate for participation in the admission process, the Petitioner
cannot be considered for the NRI category due to absence of
possession of such NRI certificate.
13. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be
no order as to costs.
[ FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J. ] [ R.I. CHAGLA J. ]
7/7
Checking your session…