Bombay High Court
MARUTI VITTHAL KULKARNI,versusSIDHOJIRAO DADASO CHAVAN AND ORS
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- VRUSHALI V JOSHI
Holding
The writ petition and the pending civil application are disposed of as per the parties' consent terms dated 30 June 2025.
Summary
Petitioner Maruti Vitthal Kulkarni filed a writ petition and a related civil application against respondents Sidhojirao Dadaso Chavan and others. The parties appeared before the court and presented a notarized Consent Terms dated 30 June 2025, a Power of Attorney, and a No Dues Certificate from Sangli Urban Co-operative Bank. The petitioner, as the auction purchaser, had paid the arrears owed to the bank, which issued the No Dues Certificate in favour of the respondents. Both parties acknowledged the consent terms and agreed that the dispute was amicably settled. The court, after verifying the documents and the parties, disposed of the writ petition and the pending civil application in accordance with the consent terms.
Subjects
- consent decree
- writ petition
- civil application
- settlement
- no dues certificate
- auction purchaser
Judgment
902-wp-10333-2010.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.10333 OF 2010
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.643 OF 2019
Maruti Vitthal Kulkarni …..Petitioner
Vs.
Sidhojirao Dadaso Chavan & Ors. …..Respondents
Mr. Aditya Ravikant Patil, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Tejpal Ingale, i/b. Mr. Nagesh Chavan, for the Respondent
Nos.1A to 1D.
Mr. Maruti Vitthal Kulkarni-Petitioner is present in person.
Smt. Vinodini Sidhojirao Chavan-Respondent No.1(a) is present in
person.
Officer of Respondent No.4-Bank is present in person.
CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.
DATED : 17th JANUARY 2026
P.C.:-
1. The counsel for the Petitioner and Respondent Nos.1(a) to 1(d)
have stated that the matter is amicably settled between the parties.
2. Smt. Vinodini Sidhojirao Chavan-Respondent No.1(a)-Power of
Attorney Holder for herself and the Respondent Nos.1(b) to 1(d), Mr.
Maruti Vitthal Kulkarni-Petitioner and officer of Respondent No.4-
Sangli Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. Sangli are present before the
Gaikwad RD 1/3
902-wp-10333-2010.doc
Court. They are verified by their respective counsel. I have also
personally verified both the parties.
3. They have tendered across the bar the Consent Terms dated
30th June 2025 duly notarized before a Notary Public, the copy of
Power of Attorney dated 6th January 2017 and ‘No Dues Certificate’
signed by Manager of Respondent No.4-Bank on record. Those are
taken on record and marked as Exhibit ‘X’ ‘X1’and ‘X2’ for
identification respectively.
4. The Consent Terms are signed by Petitioner, Respondent
No.1(a) for herself and as Power of Attorney Holder for Respondent
Nos.1(b) to 1(d) and their respective counsel. The parties
acknowledge their signatures and admit the contents of Consent
Terms.
5. The Petitioner as auction purchaser has taken the liability to
pay the arrears of the Respondent No.4 and has paid the amount to
the Respondent No.4-bank. The bank has issued ‘No Dues Certificate’.
The officer of Respondent No.4-Bank is also present. He has stated
that the ‘No Dues Certificate’ is issued by the bank in favour of
Siddhojirao Dadaso Chavan.
Gaikwad RD 2/3
902-wp-10333-2010.doc
6. The Writ Petition stands disposed of in terms of the Consent
Terms dated 30th June 2025.
7. In view of disposal of Writ Petition, Civil Application pending
therein shall also stand disposed of.
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.)
Digitally
signed by
RAJU
RAJU DATTATRAYA
DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD
GAIKWAD Date:
2026.01.19
16:26:52
+0530
Gaikwad RD 3/3
Checking your session…