Bombay High Court
MOHAMMAD MUBASHIRUDDIN SAMIUDDINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The requirement of passing TET or CTET does not apply to appointments made in minority institutions.
Summary
The petitioner, a teacher appointed on compassionate grounds, challenged the refusal of his appointment by the Education Officer, who cited a 2022 Government Resolution requiring candidates for teacher posts to have passed TET or CTET. The petitioner argued that the requirement should not apply because he is employed in a minority institution. The High Court noted its earlier rulings that the TET/CTET mandate does not extend to appointments in minority institutions. Recognizing that the petitioner’s place of work is indeed a minority institute, the Court directed the Grievance Committee to consider the petitioner’s representation filed on 17 March 2026 in light of the precedent set in Writ Petition No. 10806 of 2024. The Court ordered that the matter be decided expeditiously, within twelve weeks of receipt of the order, and disposed of the writ petition.
Issues considered
- Whether the Government Resolution requiring TET/CTET qualification for teacher appointments applies to appointments in minority institutions.
Subjects
- minority institution
- teacher appointment
- compassionate appointment
- TET
- CTET
- government resolution
- writ petition
- High Court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:37850-DB
{1} wp10347-26.doc
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.10347 OF 2026
Mohammad Mubashiruddin Samiuddin PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. Irfan D. Maniyar, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. V. M. Kagne, AGP for Respondent - State
Mrs. Yogita Thorat, Advocate for Respondent No.2
Mr. B. P. Gonare, Advocate for Respondents No.3 and 4
.......
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.]
DATE : 19th AUGUST, 2026
ORDER :
1. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 24 th
December, 2025 passed by Respondent No.2, Education Officer
(Primary), Zilla Parishad, Nanded, thereby refusing approval to
the appointment of the Petitioner made on compassionate
ground. The approval is rejected on the ground that, as per the
Government Resolution dated 11 th October, 2022, issued by the
Rural Development Department, for appointment on the post of
Teacher, the candidate must have passed TET or CTET.
2. This Court has consistently held that said requirement of
{2} wp10347-26.doc
passing TET or CTET is not applicable to the appointments made
in the Minority Institutions.
3. Admittedly, Respondent No.3, where the Petitioner is
working as a Teacher, is a minority Institute. The Petitioner has
made representation dated 17th March, 2026.
4. The Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the Grievance
Committee to consider the representation of the Petitioner dated
17th March, 2026 in the light of the decision of this Court in Writ
Petition No. 10806 of 2024, expeditiously, in any case within 12
weeks form the date of receipt of copy of this order.
[ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
JUDGE JUDGE
drp/wp10347-26.doc
Checking your session…