Bombay High Court
DINKAR MANIKRAO INGOLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court directed Respondent No.2 to decide the petitioner's representation on its merits within twelve weeks of receipt of the order.
Summary
Petitioner Dinkar Manikrao Ingole filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking a directive that Respondent No.2 decide on the petitioner's representation dated 30 January 2026. The Court examined whether the respondent was obligated to consider the representation on its merits within a reasonable time. Relying on principles of administrative efficiency and the petitioner's right to a timely decision, the Court held that the respondent must adjudicate the representation. Consequently, the Court ordered Respondent No.2 to decide the representation within twelve weeks of receiving the order. The writ petition was thereby disposed of with this directive.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate time frame within which Respondent No.2 must decide the petitioner's representation dated 30 January 2026?
Subjects
- writ petition
- representation
- high court
- direction
- time limit
- administrative law
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:37791-DB
1 16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
16 WRIT PETITION NO. 10389 OF 2026
DINKAR MANIKRAO INGOLE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Patale Amol N
AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. B.B. Bhise
Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar
…
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 20.08.2026
PER COURT :
. Writ Petition is disposed of by directing Respondent No.2 to
decide the representation of the petitioner dated 30.01.2026, on its
own merits, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of
receipt of copy of this order.
( ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. ) ( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. )
vsj..
Checking your session…