Bombay High Court
MANIK MURLIDHAR SONAWANEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court allowed the amendment of the writ petition to include the additional challenge.
Summary
Manik Murlidhar Sonawane filed Writ Petition No. 10418 of 2022 before the Bombay High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner sought to amend the petition to include a specific challenge to a communication dated 27 November 2020 (Exhibit ‘H’). The petition was presented by Ms. Pranita Pramod Hingmire, while the State was represented by Mr. B. V. Samant and Mr. A. C. Bhadang. The Court examined the request for amendment and, finding no substantive impediment, granted leave to amend the petition. Consequently, the amendment was ordered to be effected forthwith, allowing the petitioner to raise the additional ground of challenge.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may be permitted to amend the writ petition to incorporate a challenge to the communication dated 27 November 2020
Subjects
- writ petition
- amendment
- procedural law
- High Court
- civil appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
PRAJAKTA
SAGAR 904-WP 10418-22.DOC
VARTAK
Digitally signed by
PRAJAKTA SAGAR
VARTAK
Date: 2026.09.24
20:22:28 +0530
Prajakta Vartak
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 10418 OF 2022
Manik Murlidhar Sonawane ...Petitioner
Vs
State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
_________
Ms. Pranita Pramod Hingmire for Petitioner.
Mr. B. V. Samant, Addl. G. P. with Mr. A. C. Bhadang, AGP for State.
__________
CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI &
DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.
DATE: 24 SEPTEMBER 2026
P.C.
1. Leave to amend to incorporate a challenge to the communication dated 27
November 2020 (Exhibit ‘H’, page 36 of the paper-book). Let the amendment
be carried out forthwith.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
24 September 2026
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.