Bombay High Court
MD IDREES WAJID ALI AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with leave granted to the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition.
Summary
The petitioners, Md Idrees Wajid Ali and others, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court and later sought leave to withdraw the petition. The Court, after hearing the counsel, granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn, but the Court kept open the liberty for the petitioners to challenge the legality and correctness of the order if a decree is passed against them and an appeal is filed. No substantive merits of the original petition were adjudicated. The order is procedural, allowing the petitioners to re‑agitate the matter in future proceedings if needed.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioners are entitled to be granted leave to withdraw the writ petition at this stage of the proceedings?
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal of petition
- procedural law
- High Court of Bombay
- liberty to re‑agitate
Judgment
13-WP10422-2026.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 10422 OF 2026
Md Idrees Wajid Ali And Ors ...Petitioners
Versus
State Of Maharashtra And Anr …Respondents
Ms. Sadhna Singh, for the Petitioners.
Mr. A. C. Bhadang, AGP for the State.
SANTOSH
SUBHASH
KULKARNI CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J.
Digitally signed by
SANTOSH SUBHASH
KULKARNI
DATED: 21st AUGUST, 2026
Date: 2026.08.25
09:54:42 +0530
PC:-
1. The learned Counsel for the Petitioners, on instructions,
seeks leave to withdraw the Petition
Leave granted.
2. The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn keeping open
the liberty to the Petitioners to agitate the legality and
correctness of the order in the event the decree is passed
against the Petitioners and an appeal is preferred thereagainst.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
1/1
Checking your session…