Bombay High Court

SMT. FATIMABIBI GIYASUDDIN DAPHEDARversusMOHAMAD ASLAM RUKMUDDIN PARKAR AND ORS.

Decided: 17 August 2026
Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is disposed in terms of the consented compromise after verification by the Registrar.

Summary

The petitioners, Smt. Fatimabibi Giyasuddin Daphedar and others, filed a writ petition against the respondents, Mohamad Aslam Rukmuddin Parkar and others, in the High Court of Bombay. The Court, by order dated 15 July 2026, directed both parties to appear before the Registrar for verification of the compromise terms and allowed one petitioner to appear via video conferencing. The Registrar was tasked with verifying the contents of the compromise and reporting back to the Court. After verification, the Court disposed of the writ petition in accordance with the consented compromise terms. The judgment was signed by Justice Arun R. Pedneker on 17 August 2026.

Issues considered

Whether the compromise terms between the parties can be verified and the writ petition disposed in accordance with the consented terms

Subjects

compromise
writ petition
verification
video conferencing
civil appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                      Sonali Mane                                                    52-WP-1047-1998.docx



                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                           WRIT PETITION NO. 1047 OF 1998

                      Smt. Fatimabibi Giyasuddin Daphedar
                      Decd. Thr. Lrs. Mohammad Kasim
                      Gayasuddin Dafedar & Ors.                                … Petitioners
                               Versus
                      Mohamad Aslam Rukmuddin Parkar And Ors.                  … Respondents


                      Adv. Sham Thakur i/b Adv. J. M. Joshi for Petitioners.
                      Adv. A. Shaikh a/w Adv. Tahir Hussain, Adv. M. Solkar i/b Adv. Mobin
                      Solkar for Respondents.


                                                        CORAM       : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
                                                        DATE        : 17 AUGUST, 2026
                      P.C. :


                      1.            This Court, by order dated 15 July, 2026, directed the parties

                      to remain present before the Registrar for verification of the

                      compromise and also permitted Petitioner No. 1.3.1 to appear through

                      video conferencing. The Registrar has verified the contents of the

                      compromise terms and submit his report to this Court.



                      2.            The Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of consent terms.



 MANE
 SONALI                                                              [ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.]
 DILIP
Digitally signed by
MANE SONALI
DILIP
Date: 2026.08.19
12:31:58 +0530
                                                             1/1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…