Bombay High Court
AUGUSTO T. D'SOUZA AND ANR.,versusCAETAN D'SOUZA (DEC) THR. HIS LRS., FELICIA PINTO AND 3 ORS.,
- Disposal
- Infructuos
Holding
The writ petitions are infructuous and are therefore disposed of.
Summary
In 2018, Augusto T. D'Souza and several co‑petitioners filed five writ petitions (Nos. 105‑109) in the High Court of Bombay at Goa against Caetan D'Souza, his legal representatives, Felicia Pinto and others. The petitions sought unspecified reliefs against the respondents. After a considerable lapse of time, the petitioners' counsel submitted that the prayers in the writ petitions could no longer survive and were rendered infructuous. The Court examined the argument that the passage of time bars the continuation of the petitions. Relying on the principle that a petition that remains unacted upon for an extended period loses its operative effect, the Court held that the petitions were infructuous. Consequently, all five writ petitions were disposed of as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the prayers in writ petitions survive after a prolonged lapse of time.
Subjects
- writ petition
- lapse of time
- infructuous
- procedural bar
- petition disposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-GOA:1694
21 WP 105 2018
Jose
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO.105 OF 2018
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.106 OF 2018, WRIT PETITION NO.108 OF
2018, WRIT PETITION NO.107 OF 2018, WRIT PETITION NO.109
OF 2018
WRIT PETITION NO.105 OF 2018
AUGUSTO T. D'SOUZA AND ANR., ... PETITIONER
Versus
CAETAN D'SOUZA (DEC) THR. HIS
LRS., FELICIA PINTO AND 3 ORS., ... RESPONDENT
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.106 OF 2018
AUGUSTO T. D'SOUZA AND ANR., ... PETITIONER
Versus
CAETAN D'SOUZA (DEC) THR. HIS
LRS., FELICIA PINTO AND 3 ORS., ... RESPONDENT
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.108 OF 2018
AUGUSTO T. D'SOUZA AND ANR., ... PETITIONER
Versus
CAETAN D'SOUZA (DEC) THR. HIS
LRS., FELICIA PINTO AND 3 ORS., ... RESPONDENT
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.107 OF 2018
AUGUSTO T. D'SOUZA AND ANR., ... PETITIONER
Versus
CAETAN D'SOUZA (DEC) THR. HIS
LRS., FELICIA PINTO AND 3 ORS., ... RESPONDENT
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.109 OF 2018
AUGUSTO T. D'SOUZA AND ANR., ... PETITIONER
Versus
CAETAN D'SOUZA (DEC) THR. HIS
LRS., FELICIA PINTO AND 3 ORS., ... RESPONDENT
Mr Gaurish Agni with Mr Kishan Kavlekar, Advocates for the
Page 1 of 2
24th August, 2026
21 WP 105 2018
Petitioners.
Ms Isabel Da Costa, Advocate for the Respondents.
CORAM:- S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATED :- 24th August, 2026
P.C.:
1. Learned Advocate appearing for Petitioner submits that, by
efflux of time, prayers in Writ Petitions do not survive and are
rendered infructuous.
2. In view of the statement made, all Writ Petitions stand
disposed of as infructuous.
S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
Signed by: JOSE FRANCISCO
DSOUZA
Page 2 of 2
Designation: Personal Assistant
Date: 24/08/2026 17:25:53 24th August, 2026
Checking your session…