Bombay High Court

MANISHA DINESH PARMARversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI,

Decided: 18 August 2026
Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court ordered the correction of its earlier order, substituting 'tax' with 'property/repair cess' and disposed of the praecipe.

Summary

Manisha Dinesh Parmar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 18 August 2026 passed by the Court. The petitioner sought a correction in Paragraph 2 of that order, requesting that the term 'tax' be replaced with 'property/repair cess'. The Court considered the prayer as a procedural correction of its own order and found no substantive issue requiring a hearing. Accordingly, the Court directed that the order be corrected to reflect the appropriate terminology and that the corrected order be uploaded. The praecipe filed for this correction was thereafter disposed of.

Issues considered

Whether the Court should amend its order to replace the word 'tax' with 'property/repair cess'?

Subjects

order correction
civil procedure
writ petition
municipal corporation
property cess

Judgment

                                                                                      (902)-WP-1053-26.odt

      PANCHAL

                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

           Digitally
           signed by
           JAYANT
                                            WRIT PETITION NO. 1053 OF 2026
JAYANT     VISHWANATH
VISHWANATH SALUNKE
SALUNKE    Date:
           2026.08.24
           11:45:08
           +0530
                        Manisha Dinesh Parmar                                   ...Petitioner
                             Versus
                        Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors.          ...Respondents
                                                              ...
                        Mr. Devang Parmar, for the Petitioner.
                        Ms. K. H. Mastakar, for the Respondent - BMC.
                                                              ...

                                                  CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ACJ. &
                                                          GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.

                                                   DATE : 21st AUGUST, 2026.

                        P.C.:
                        1.           This is a motion for speaking to the minutes of the order dated

                        18th August, 2026. It is pointed out that in Paragraph No.2 of the order, the

                        word ‘tax’ appearing in the last sentence should be replaced by the words,

                        ‘property/repair cess’.


                        2.           The order be corrected and uploaded.


                        3.           The praecipe is disposed off.




                        [GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.]                         [ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE]




                                                               1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.