Bombay High Court

ANJANABAI SUDAM BORATE AND ORSversusPUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THR ITS MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER AND ORS

Decided: 18 August 2026
Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

The Court disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn on the petitioners' request.

Summary

Mrs. Anjanabai Sudam Borate and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Pune Municipal Corporation. The petitioners’ counsel initially sought a pass over the matter. Subsequently, the petitioners instructed their counsel to withdraw the petition. The Court considered the petitioners’ request to withdraw the writ petition. In accordance with procedural rules, the Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the original dispute were addressed.

Issues considered

Whether the Court can dispose of a writ petition as withdrawn upon the petitioners' request

Subjects

writ petition
withdrawal
civil appellate jurisdiction
procedure

Judgment

TRUPTI
SADANAND
BAMNE
                                                          1                910-wp-10577-2026.odt
Digitally signed by
TRUPTI SADANAND
BAMNE
Date: 2026.08.19
11:02:21 +0530

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                        WRIT PETITION NO. 10577 OF 2026

                      Mrs.Anjanabai Sudam Borate & Ors.                  … Petitioners
                            versus
                      Pune Municipal Corporation & Ors.                  … Respondents

                                                         ……
                      Mr.Shrirang Katneshwarkar with Mr.Sandeep Gupta for the Petitioners.
                      Mr.R.M.Pethe for the Respondent – Pune Municipal Corporation.
                                                      …...

                                          CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ACJ
                                                      &
                                                  GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.


                                           DATE     : 18 AUGUST, 2026

                      P.C.:

                      1.           This matter was heard for some time. We expressed our

                      disinclination.


                      2.           The learned Advocate for the Petitioners sought a pass over.



                      3.           After the matter was called out, the learned Advocate for the

                      Petitioners submits, on instructions, that the Petitioners desire to

                      withdraw this Petition.


                                                                                    Trupti S. Bamne
                                  2               910-wp-10577-2026.odt




4.          In view of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed off as

withdrawn, on instructions.




(GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.)                (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)




                                                           Trupti S. Bamne

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…