Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ARJUN LIMBAJIRAO SUKREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court directed respondent No.2 to decide the representation on its merits within twelve weeks, thereby disposing of the petition.

Summary

Arjun Limbaijirao Sukre filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the failure of the State of Maharashtra to decide his representation dated 18 August 2025. The petitioner alleged undue delay and sought a direction for a prompt decision. The Court examined whether it could compel the respondent authority to adjudicate the representation on its merits, taking into account prevailing government policies, resolutions, circulars, and its own earlier orders. Relying on principles of administrative efficiency and the need for timely justice, the Court directed the respondent to decide the representation on its own merit. The direction required the decision to be rendered within twelve weeks of receipt of the order, and the petition was thereafter disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court can direct the respondent authority to decide the petitioner's representation dated 18/08/2025 on its merits within a specified time frame

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • representation
  • administrative law
  • court direction
  • timely decision

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:39558-DB


                                                    1                     38-WP-10580-26.odt


                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                               WRIT PETITION NO. 10580 OF 2026

                                    ARJUN LIMBAJIRAO SUKRE
                                             VERSUS
                           THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                                 ...
              Mr. Eknath G. Irale, Advocate for the Petitioner
              Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP for Respondents/State
                                                 ...

                                           CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                   ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
                                            DATE : 25th AUGUST, 2026

              PER COURT :

              .              The writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent

              No.2    to    decide   the    representation   of   the   petitioner    dated

              18/08/2025, on it’s own merit by taking into consideration the

              prevailing policy / Government Resolutions / Circulars and the orders

              passed by this Court, as expeditiously as possible and in any case,

              within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of copy of

              this order.



                  (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)              (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)




              SVH


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.