Bombay High Court
MOTODEN AUTOMOTIVE PVT. LTD.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ADDL CHIEF SEC. TRANSPORT DEPT. AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petition was dismissed as the impugned suspension order had been withdrawn.
Summary
Motoden Automotive Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition challenging the suspension of its certificate by an order dated 6 August 2026. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Suhas S. Deokar and Mr. Tanmay M. Shembavanekar. The State of Maharashtra, represented by AGP Smt. V. R. Raje, informed the Court that an earlier order dated 18 August 2023 had withdrawn the impugned suspension order. The Court held that, in view of the withdrawal, the petition no longer had any operative relief to seek. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed without further hearing, though the petitioner was permitted to challenge any future action by the respondents.
Issues considered
- The legality of the suspension of the certificate issued on 6 August 2026
- The effect of the withdrawal of the impugned order on the pending writ petition
Subjects
- certificate suspension
- writ petition
- withdrawal of order
- administrative law
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
10 WP-10617-26.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 10617 OF 2026
Motoden Automotive Pvt. Ltd. ..Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & ors. …Respondents
Mr. Suhas S Deokar a/w Mr. Tanmay M Shembavanekar, for
the Petitioner.
Smt. V R Raje, AGP for Respondent - State.
CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J.
DATE : 20th August 2026
SAINATH P.C.:
SANJAY
BODKHE
Digitally signed
by SAINATH
SANJAY BODKHE
Date: 2026.08.24
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner.
21:02:37 +0530
2. Smt. Raje, the learned AGP, informed the Court that, by
an order dated 18th August, 2023, the impugned order dated
06th August, 2026 suspending the certificate, has been
withdrawn.
3. In view of the withdrawal of the impugned order, this
petition does not survive.
4. The Writ Petition stands disposed.
5. In the event, the respondents take any further action, the
petitioner would be at liberty to assail the legality and validity of
those actions.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
SAINATH, PA 1/1
Checking your session…