Bombay High Court

ANAND KASHIRAM SAPKALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition was withdrawn and disposed of with liberty to institute an appropriate proceeding.

Summary

Petitioner Anand Kashiram Sapkale filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1063 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner later instructed counsel to withdraw the petition and to pursue an alternative remedy. The respondents, represented by State counsel, did not oppose the withdrawal. The bench, after noting the request, allowed the withdrawal and ordered the petition to stand disposed, granting liberty to institute an appropriate proceeding. No substantive legal issues were decided and the case was closed without any order on the merits.

Subjects

withdrawal of petition
criminal writ petition
procedural remedy

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:38783-DB


                                           1                  903 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1063 OF 2026



                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                        903 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1063 OF 2026

                            ANAND KASHIRAM SAPKALE
                                          VERSUS
                      THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                             …..
            Adv. S. A. Sapkale, Advocate for the Petitioner
            Adv. A. S. Shinde, APP for Respondents-State
                                             …..

                                       CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                               VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                       DATED : 27/08/2026
            Per Court:

            .          The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks

            withdrawal of this petition with liberty to take out an appropriate

            proceeding as permissible under law in the form of alternate

            remedy.



            2.         In view of the same, the petition stands disposed of with the

            liberty as aforesaid.




            ( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. )

            shivani/

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…