Bombay High Court
AKSHAY BABASAHEB KAMBLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that the Education Officer must decide the petitioner’s proposal within twelve weeks, taking into account the decisions in writ petitions Nos. 7357/2023 and 1457/2026.
Summary
Akshay Babasaheb Kamble filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner submitted a proposal on 10 August 2026 which had not been acted upon by the Education Officer. The Court examined the delay and referred to its earlier decisions in writ petitions Nos. 7357/2023 and 1457/2026. It directed the Education Officer (Respondent No.3) to decide the petitioner’s proposal within twelve weeks of receiving the order. The petition was consequently disposed with a specific time‑bound direction.
Issues considered
- Whether the Education Officer should be directed to decide the petitioner’s proposal within a reasonable time, in view of earlier judgments
Subjects
- writ petition
- administrative law
- education
- delay in decision
- court direction
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:37830-DB
1 72-WP-10638-26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 10638 OF 2026
AKSHAY BABASAHEB KAMBLE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND
OTHERS
...
Mr. Girish L. Awale, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. S. R. Wakle, AGP for Respondents/State
…
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 19th AUGUST, 2026
PER COURT :
. The writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent
No.3 Education Officer to decide the proposal of the petitioner dated
10/08/2026, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt
of copy of this order, by taking into consideration the decision of
this Court in Writ Petition Nos.7357/2023 and 1457/2026.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
SVH
Checking your session…