Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

M/S SHIVGANGA CONSTRUCTION AND ORSversusPIMPRI CHINCHWAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn on the petitioners' instructions.

Summary

M/s. Shivganga Construction & Ors. filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court against Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation. The petitioners, through their counsel, initially sought a pass over. Subsequently, the petitioners informed the court that they wished to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request and, noting the petitioners' instruction, disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the dispute were addressed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioners after filing
  • Whether the court can dispose of a petition solely on the petitioners' request for withdrawal

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • procedure

Judgment

TRUPTI
SADANAND
BAMNE
                                                          1                912-wp-10640-2026.odt
Digitally signed by
TRUPTI SADANAND
BAMNE
Date: 2026.08.19
11:02:21 +0530

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                        WRIT PETITION NO. 10640 OF 2026

                      M/s. Shivganga Construction & Ors.                       … Petitioners
                            versus
                      Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation & Anr.            … Respondents

                                                         ……
                      Mr.Akhilesh Jaiswal with Mr.Himanshu Patil for the Petitioners.
                      Mr.Sandeep Dilip Shinde for the Respondents.
                                                       …...

                                          CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ACJ
                                                      &
                                                  GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.


                                           DATE     : 18 AUGUST, 2026

                      P.C.:


                      1.           This matter was heard for some time. We expressed our

                      disinclination.


                      2.           The learned Advocate for the Petitioners sought a pass over.


                      3.           After the matter was called out, the learned Advocate for the

                      Petitioners submits, on instructions, that the Petitioners desire to

                      withdraw this Petition.


                                                                                    Trupti S. Bamne
                                  2               912-wp-10640-2026.odt




4.          In view of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed off as

withdrawn, on instructions.




(GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.)                (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)




                                                           Trupti S. Bamne


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.