Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

USHA DEEPAK SAPKALversusANIL PRABHAKAR SINKAR AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition was dismissed as wholly frivolous.

Summary

Usha Deepak Sapkal filed a writ petition (No. 10643 of 2026) in the Bombay High Court against Anil Prabhakar Sinkar and others. The petition was argued before the Court by counsel Mr. Bhavin Gada and associates. The Court examined the petition and concluded that it was wholly frivolous. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition. The dismissal was accompanied by an order that the petitioner pay costs of Rs.25,000 to be deposited with the District Legal Services Authority, Mumbai within two weeks.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • frivolous petition
  • costs

Judgment

                                                                     44-WP10643-2026.DOC

                                                                                   Santosh

                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 10643 OF 2026

                      Usha Deepak Sapkal                                     ...Petitioner
                                        Versus
                      Anil Prabhakar Sinkar and ors.                    …Respondents

                      Mr. Bhavin Gada, a/w Deepak Shukla and Shweta Thakur, i/b
                           BNS Legal, for the Petitioner.
                      Mr. Sandeep Bane, a/w Shubham bane, for Respondent No.1.
                      Ms. Jaya Bagwe, for Respondent Nos.2 to 4.
SANTOSH               Smt. Savita Prabhune, AGP for the State.
SUBHASH
KULKARNI
Digitally signed by
                                                         CORAM:    N. J. JAMADAR, J.
SANTOSH SUBHASH
KULKARNI                                                 DATED:    25th AUGUST, 2026
Date: 2026.08.27
11:46:24 +0530


                      PC:-

                      1.     Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner.


                      2.     The petition is wholly frivolous.


                      3.     Hence, the petition stands dismissed with costs of

                      Rs.25,000/- to be deposited with the District Legal Services

                      Authority, Mumbai, within a period of two weeks from today.




                                                                 [N. J. JAMADAR, J.]




                                                       1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.