Bombay High Court
RAJENDRA RAMKISHAN JAISWAL AND OTHERSversusTHE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that the respondent must decide the petitioners' objection on its merits within eight weeks and communicate the decision.
Summary
Petitioners Rajendra Ramkishan Jaiswal and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the Municipal Commissioner regarding an objection they raised on 06.05.2025. The Court examined whether the respondent was obligated to adjudicate the petitioners' objection on its merits. After consideration, the Court directed the respondent (No.3) to decide the objection within eight weeks of receiving the order and to communicate the decision to the petitioners. No substantive merits of the objection were addressed in the order. The petition was consequently disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether the Municipal Commissioner is required to decide the petitioners' objection dated 06.05.2025 on its merits
Subjects
- writ petition
- municipal commissioner
- objection
- procedural direction
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:39083-DB
1 37.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
37 WRIT PETITION NO. 10664 OF 2026
RAJENDRA RAMKISHAN JAISWAL AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Rupesh Anil Jaiswal
AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.R. Wakale
…
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 27.08.2026
PER COURT :
. Writ Petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.3 to
decide the Objection of the petitioners dated 06.05.2025, on its own
merits, within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of
copy of this order and communicate the decision to the petitioners.
( ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. ) ( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. )
vsj..
Checking your session…